I'm interested in hearing people's views on how you decide what behaviour to change with ABA.
Obviously, you want to empower the child to develop skills, and moderate behaviour which is affecting a child's ability to function at home or at school.
But I always wonder about where you draw the line.
For example, we have a therapist coming into school. DS has various quirks and props which get him through the school day and some behaviours which cause problems. He also needs help with social skills and communication. The traditional LA OT/EP line is to accommodate things rather than give the child the skills to cope, but I think there are areas where DS is better off being accommodated than learning to integrate, for example it is important he is able to feel confident about saying he is stressed in assemblies and feels able to participate it he sits in a chair a distance a way.
This is a temporary measure specific to the school environment and it teaches DS to feel that he can participate, albeit not necessarily in exactly the same way. His peers don't care and happily accept this. HIs TA doesn't like him being different.
This is a learnt behaviour but it is so far down my list of problems, it isnt even on the list.
Am I right in thinking that ABA seeks to work on behaviour changes which are important to the child rather than the adults around him?