That's exactly it Tiredness.
We recently went for what was supposed to be a SALT assessment, as ds hadn't had any SALT input or assessment at all, not even during the supposedly multi-disciplinary assessment and the Paed found out. The assessment unit said they had felt he didn't need a full assessment as he scored so highly on the Verbal Comprehension element of his WISC IV assessment. 
The thing is, it's not comprehension, so much as communication skills relating to expressing his needs and feelings that's the problem. He doesn't understand tone of voice and intonation etc, which leads not only to him sounding extremely rude when he doesn't mean to, but also him 'reading' other peoples' expression and tone of voice wrong, leading to endless arguments.
Much was made during SA and in his Statement about the need for him to significantly improve and develop his emotional literacy skills, but no-one is addressing the problem of actually being able to communicate those feelings, emotions and needs, if/when he learns to be more self-aware and understand his own emotions better.
Apparently NHS salt 'don't do that' in this area - only functional language problems are handled here due to huge demand and under-resourcing.
He was having 1:1 Inclusion Team sessions, because his anxiety and emotional issues were so bad, but his inclusion teacher has been landed with a huge extra workload and is going to have to drop the sessions. His statement just says the emotional literacy work should be done by someone properly qualified to understand and work with emotional and anxiety issues in children with ASD and this should be achieved through specified intital and ongoing training, plus professional development and attendance on a programme such as the Government's new Autism Education Trust Programme. I had to fight for that, despite the EP being totally in agreement and I only got it because threatened appeal if it wasn't included.
What did he get from the school? A completely unqualified TA, with no more than attendance, a year and a half ago, on the very basic whole school one day ASD awareness that even the handyman and lunchtime supervisors attended. I specifically questioned the SENCO about this TA's training and qualifications and she mumbled something about the inclusion team saying the whole school needs another 'awareness top-up' day and that she would have inclusion team back-up. The woman they have set up as his support and to work with him in development of his emotional awareness and anxiety issues has no idea how to handle children with ASD, or how having ASD affects their communication and self-awareness skills, yet she is also supporting another child with ASD at other times of the day. I have personally watched her royally stuff up her handling of the other child, resulting in him shutting down and hiding in a corner, terrified, in front of all the junior school parents at pick up time. As a result I was desperate for the school not to allocate her to ds, whilst knowing full well that that was exactly what they would do. 
School have 'interpreted' the statement purely to meet their own needs in terms of resourcing - nothing to do with ds's needs. In fact they have specifically chosen to set things up in such as a way that they can't meet his needs, whilst trying to tell me he doesn't have those needs. 
This is despite the statement actually being very specific in some of those areas. Needless to say, dh and I are gathering evidence and will be employing the steel-capped butt kicking boots very soon. Unfortunately, the LEA's Statementing Officer refuses to believe the school SENCO ever does anything wrong and said it was fine for them not to have implemented his statement as it was 'early days', that the school has to be able to interpret the statement to be able to meet his needs and they only have my ds's best interests at hear and the best one ... apparently my issues with the school are purely down to my own problems with lack of trust! 
I am so sick of the fighting though. I thought I might at least get a little break once we won the statement. Should have known better.