Please or to access all these features

SN children

Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.

LGO - what can I say? It gets better

6 replies

appropriatelyemployed · 19/05/2012 23:13

OK, one year on.

THREE provisional judgments later.

The LGO in a truly pathetic judgement now concede that the LA did nothing wrong in not putting provision in place for up to 6 months. But that, having said that, there was maladministration in the failing to provide and I will now be paid a measly £250. No apology as they already apologised back in April when they lied and said provision was in place.

It's not the money. Why did they not determine this last May? If they had, would the LA really have decided to brand me vexatious? They used the LGO's exoneration to do this.

THREE f*ing judgments! Seriously, there is nothing they know now that they didn't know a year ago. What an absolute disgrace.

To add insult to injury, they are just completely side-stepping the vexatious stuff. They have not even bothered to look into what my letters were saying or whether the LA followed their own procedure or a process consistent with public law.

But they have said the LA's policy should have contained provision for a warning and that they are suggesting that the policy be changed. They have also said the determination should have been reviewed as promised but that it wasn't.

But.......still not maladministration!!!

What a load of absolute nonsense. They have clearly been told by the LA there is no way they are apologise to me.

OP posts:
StarlightMcKenzie · 19/05/2012 23:15

No. They are giving you £250 and hoping you now go away.

As if ANYONE would go to the lengths you have FOR the £250 Hmm. Probably doesn't even cover your printer ink.

StarlightMcKenzie · 19/05/2012 23:18

Sorry AE.

I guess you need to think on this and consider your options now. Whether to continue (can you?) or whether you feel that despite your ridiculous outcome you have sent messages to the right places.

WetAugust · 19/05/2012 23:20

It's dismal isn't it.

A toothless watchdog with the LAs as its master Angry

It beggars belief how the LGO continues this deception. Why on earth has it not been investigated by now?

Snap - I got a £250 cheque too. Barely covered the cost of paper, postage and printer cartridges. I did get an aplogy though.

So where does that leave the vexatious slur? If you now having a ruling of maladministration then you were surely vindicated in your complaint / discussios with the LA that led you to being tarred as vexatious. Vexatious is when the complaint is unjusitfied / unfounded so as the actions you complained of have been found to have been maladminstration that automatically reneders your complaint at that time to have been justified i.e. not vexatious.

Next steps - MP? Press?

appropriatelyemployed · 19/05/2012 23:39

It's ridiculous.

The LGO is now advising changes to local authority vexatious procedure and admit that at the time I was determined vexatious DS's provision wasn't in place and that I was obliged to correspond with the LA because of Tribunal but that it is not maladministration.

You are right. They think I will go away.

OP posts:
ArthurPewty · 20/05/2012 09:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

appropriatelyemployed · 20/05/2012 10:23

I think so.

It is interesting that, on no additional evidence, they can determine something that could have been determined a year ago.

I think they are so beholden to what the LAs will agree that the judgments completely lack coherence e..g the Council did this wrong but it's not maladministration, it did nothing wrong here but it is maladministration.

It just smacks of reflecting those bits that the LA have agreed to sign off on.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page