I cannot believe I am here again at a new school!
The head is very good but DS's relationship with his TA has deteriorated and so many things are happening now which make me really angry.
The head has organised a meeting with the TA, teacher, me and him for Monday but I am worried I will get too confrontational and angry. I feel perhaps the issues I am raising need to be heard by the head first and then addressed internally.
Can you see what you think? I posted in another threat about most of it, but, in summary:
- I have found out that of the two tasks set by the ABA therapist, only one is being done by the TA. The other, which set up a regular break pattern for him was disregarded by her as 'too disruptive' to his learning.
- I found out that DS's keyboard skill, working memory programme and OT were not being done so I have taken his laptop home - it is one provided by the physical impairment service and has specialist software on it. It has not been used by DS in school at all since it was set up two months ago. TA said she had not done working memory programme because it was a 'battle' to get him to do it.
- Negative language about him is creeping in to the TA's discussions. On Friday, in front of the head, she described him as 'rude and aggressive' (something which he got very upset about) and she has said he was being 'contrary' or 'silly'. The head apologised for this. But she is a teacher. I don't accept loaded language is helpful. It says more about her than the behaviour. Should she not keep to neutral language and just describe what has happened not what she thinks about it?
- After the ABA intervention, the ABA therapist pointed out practices which could be changed. Things like DS sitting on the carpet, or sitting up well for a bit. Now some of these things they have set up for him, it wasn't that he asked to sit at the back of the class and not on the carpet. She explained how they could change sitting with modelling behaviour and then allowing him to sit as he wants for a bit too. This has now deteriorated into 'sit up, you know not to sit like that' said very sharply in my presence. Also, practices are changed without explanation e.g. DS used to go in the side door back class after break rather than line up with everyone else. This week, he's been stopped from doing this and just told to line up. No explanation. I have no objection to the end objective but this seems poor practice to me - they set up this practice, why not just explain to him what you are trying to achieve? Where is the planning for change?
- On Friday, I found he had been in a group doing maths outside the class with the TA. He had laughed at someone making a mistake. She reprimanded him and said 'how do you feel when people laugh at you?' He said 'if I make a joke, I like it when people laugh'. She then gave everyone a house point bar him and when he asked, she aid it was because of what he had said. He said she had never given house points in that group before and so felt she was doing it to be mean to him which seems true.
- I have also noticed that she is reprimanding him in front of me - e.g. 'don't do that DS, that is rude'. [mm]
Head thinks home/school book will help but she would never have told me about point (5) would she? She is just going to use it to dump her frustrations.
So - questions:
- ABA doesn't mean just changing practices without explanation or motivation does it? He feels like he is being punished for something he's been allowed to do
- How do I handle this? I have a feeling a group meeting at this stage is not helpful. I am speaking to the ABA consultant on Monday and I have intimated to the head that I am not happy and he has partly agreed with some of the things I have said. I do not want to end up in a confrontation and piss off the head? Maybe it's easier for the head if I say this to her straight?