This is occupying my mind a lot at the moment. Briefly an NHS SALT spent 10 mins with ds (dx AS) and discharged him, saying his speech was at least average, and he had SCD which should be addressed within school. The assessment report was 4 lines long.
I asked to meet her and she bluffed her way through, saying "all asd children" had the same problems and patronisingly, "if I was you, I would be asking for help too". She said he didn't need any direct help from her and school should help him; the PCT had a clinical pathway that excluded support for ASD children.
Following a FOI, I found that they were supporting a number of children with ASD. When I challenged her, she said the FOI return was wrong, due to a secretary who shouldn't have completed it
. She then referred me to her manager. There followed a number of communications where the manager supported her and I got nowhere.
So I went to my GP and got another referral. The SALT refused to see ds
.
The thing is, ds also has other speech and language difficulties unrelated to asd, and an NHS OT picked up on this. The SALT basically couldn't be bothered to conduct an assessment, and jumped to conclusions and discharged him.
I appointed an independent SALT who conducted an hour long screening and from the feedback, confirmed all my suspicions and ds needs substantial input.
I feel strongly it is wrong that I should have to pay for an independent salt, and it is my suspicion that this is not the first time she has done this, so practised and glib was her spiel.
However, if I complain, any possible support/relationship in future would surely not be possible? Also I am about to apply for a statement, which would include asking for SALT which usually comes from the NHS?
What would you do?