I'm going to try and answer your original query on this thread and the additional questions you posted on the other North Yorkshire thread.
On the other thread you asked:
Could you possibly comment on the services in Skipton area?
Do you know what the "standard" package for an ASD related statement in mainstream school is in N York?s? Do they fund 1:1 LSA, Occupational Therapy and Speech Therapy in mainstream school setting (if this is what is recommended from statutory assessment)?
I don't know the particulars about Skipton area. There is no 'standard package' other than the minimum they can get away with. As you have been to tribunal twice, I suspect you have a good, quantified and specified statement. North Yorks will not like this. My guess is they will want to review the statement quickly and then water down, with the usual 'should', 'access too' nonsense, leaving you with very little by way of a meaningful statement.
They do fund LSAs. Usually 50-75%, written as 'access to' etc. in statements. 20 hours is the what is considered the minimum before a child qualifies for a statement in North Yorkshire (they are a highly delegating LA), so in the worst case, it may be they reassess and remove the statement entirely and put you child on School Action Plus. Be prepared for that.
In my experience speech and language therapy is indirect for practically all children not in special school - either termly or half termly. Skipton, I think, is covered by a different PCT (Airedale) to the rest of North Yorkshire , so it may well be different, but I wouldn't bet on it. SALT, throughout the rest of N Yorks are very willing to do the minimum and do what they are told by the Council. They are not interested in what is best for the child, and, in any case, have no clue how to get a child with autism to comply with targets. They view that as something for schools to do. SALT always appears in part 6 of statements unless it is challenged. I think weekly SALT is unheard of. Speak to AWARE in Keighley- they will know about SALT provision in Airedale PCT and possibly about Skipton schools more generally, and they are lovely.
OT is the same.
The SEN team think nothing of ignoring professional reports from stat assess if they do not fit with what they want to provide. Profs do not quantify or specify in their reports in any case. You may get e.g. 'x would benefit from being in an environment with specialist staff' which would be code for special school, but probably nothing more. Certainly nothing on number of hours.
LA policies are on their website. Their view is all children should be in their local mainstream school because this is the cheapest provision to meet the inclusion agenda, so the council will be supportive of mainstream in your case. Only children with 'high needs, low incidence' will be statemented according to the council. Individual schools vary enormously, but as a general rule schools that take more disadvantaged kids tend to be better with SEN than academic schools. There will be exceptions.
You ask is it possible to get an equivalent package. The answer is yes, it certainly is, but probably not without a fight. Sorry to be so bleak. My response is based on personal experience and knowledge of a good number of other children with autism.