Was told last June that my ds reading age was 11.5 (have it in writing), last week was told it is now 10.8. This has filled me with distrust as I felt that the 11.5 was way over. At that time I felt his reading age was 9.5 ish. judging by the books he was reading. A few weeks ago was told it was 11 ish. What do you make of this? Does anyone know if it is possible to get that degree of variation. When he had a reading age of 6, I was told that to get to 6.5 was a significant leap, so surely to go from 11.5 down to 10.8 is significant unless the initial figure was plucked out of the air. My concerns were brushed under the carpet. As I have not been happy with the literacy intervention, the only way I can tell if it is working is by tracking progress, but the tracking is unreliable based on this. Mind you I shouldn't worry of course as they have plenty of kids who don't read as well as my ds. somebody should ban such statements from the training manual I'm fed-up with these sort of comparisons, totally unprofessional.