Tribunal has been postponed, indefinately it would seem. Dunno whether it would be faster to now just go to the annual review in April and resubmit appeal than stick with this one 
ABA has been too effective. There is no provision for him in the UK it seems. Too capable for special school. Even been rejected from indpendent mainstream school that prides itself on 'inclusion' and having access to 'specialisms' because ds is too capable and too advanced and yet, all the experts are quite clear he would not manage mainstream and that he has outgrown Lovaas. 
Now, you and I know that ABA isn't Lovaas, but expert advice (and we have REALLY sought it out) is that our programme is now unrecognisable as an ABA programme as it has developed to meet ds' needs (well obviously - that is what ABA IS) and it would be like arguing for one eclectic approach against another (well obviously again - as that is what ABA IS!) and we have been advised many times over that tribunal panels are too thick to understand that, nevermind LAs, even thought the overwhelming conclusion is that his programme is perfect for him.
So we could go onto our 4th solicitor, 3rd EP if we like, but honestly we ended up paying for some BIG ONES due to having received some 'evidence' annonymously through our door that showed there has been some VERY dirty play. (I now know who sent them and it is a source I trust)
But still, our eclectic approach that no-one understands but ds' is progressing brilliantly on is STILL cheaper than the LA's provision.
I have no faith in anyone now!