ok.....so chelation is used for lead poisioning only. The links are for intravenious chelation which is obviously much more dramatic than a soak in the bath.
Not disputing the story of the poor child as that is awful. However statistically and medical wise if you have lead poisoning then that is serious in itself and your body can shut down and lead to death? It doesnt say how many cases it has successfully been used on where people have survived lead poisoning.
All this is interesting, as we all want the best for our children and we all have our own ways of wishing to persue help and therapy for them. I wouldnt belittle anyone for persuing any particular route as its purely a matter of personal choice.
I have to say though that it is all confusing, as there is information that tells you our children are mineral defficient on one hand but too many metals on another. I dont think I would use this bath soak not purely because of those links as those are nothing to do with what we are talking about, but purely reading that it also removes calcium which is vital for our bodies. You would have to be so careful and perhaps give suppliments to replace the calcium and anything else. To me its like permanently playing a balancing act with a lot of intolerance tests, or test showing what the child is lacking in, which of course is more money on top of the extortionate cost of the mud soak, and I dont think I would like to play around with my sons health in that way. I guess I am all for putting goodness back in but wary of trying to take out iyswim.