Sorry, I expect many of you are sick of seeing threads from me about statements/tribunals. But please can I call on the MNSN wisdom again?
The latest is that the first proposed statement has now been amended to give ds 25 hours 1:1 a week (originally was 15). None of the other significant amendments we asked for have been included - most importantly, ABA-trained or at the very least, appropriately trained, experienced TA/LSA. Plus the rest of the statement is still pretty unspecified ("access to", "opportunities to" kind of stuff).
The LEA took 7 weeks to get the amended statement back to us after our first comments. They are now hassling us to get the Agree/Disagree form back and get it finalised, probably because the school we preferred have finally come back and said they can take him, so they want to get the ball rolling. They told us the school decision on Friday and, funnily enough, have been amazingly proactive since then in phoning/emailing now that they want our forms back asap 
The school option isn't the most important thing about the statement, but it is obv a difficult time as ds is due to start school in September so we want to plan transition asap.
So, we have the choice of either trying to continue to negotiate to get what we want without tribunal; or accept the statement as final, and then put in an appeal.
This means ds would start Reception in September on the existing statement, and (unless the school agrees to us sending a tutor in ourselves) possibly without ABA support - which terrifies me.
Or, if we continue to try and negotiate, this takes us into the summer holidays. And of course if they havne't taken most of our comments on board the first time, what are the chances of them doing so this time?
WWYD?