Please or to access all these features

SN children

Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.

Our preferred school named in final statement,

15 replies

Starchart · 25/06/2011 19:41

despite their appeal.

Tick!

OP posts:
TheNinjaGooseIsOnAMission · 25/06/2011 20:04

fantastic news star Smile

tiredoffightingwithjelly · 25/06/2011 20:11

well done starchart, what sort of school is it and why did they appeal?

Starchart · 25/06/2011 20:17

Well it's all a bit crazy but they appealed because then have 3 children with additional needs and 'support' going into that mainstream classroom and they thought that there would be too many adults which would effect the education of the other children.

However, ds final statement has failed to specify TA support or SLT for that matter (which is why we are going to tribunal) so they didn't have a case Hmm

Hope that gives you some amusement. It does me.

OP posts:
bochead · 25/06/2011 20:43

saves you just one battle : )

EllenJaneisnotmyname · 25/06/2011 21:34

Every cloud has a silver lining! If you are going to tribunal, will they still implement the statement as it stands in the meantime? Will your DS still get to start at this school in Sept? When is tribunal?

Starchart · 25/06/2011 21:36

Well the tribunal won't be until Dec/Jan. And the statement has to be the crap that it is now.

However, we have the legal right to hold ds back until Jan, as is the right of all Reception age children and if the support isn't in place satisfactorily then we'll just wait.

OP posts:
tiredoffightingwithjelly · 25/06/2011 21:45

Very amusing Star, made me smile.

I guess your plan means they have to keep the place but doesn't this mean your child won't get to know the other children and will this disadvantage them? I suppose though if there isn't specific provision for your child, the risks of what could go wrong would outweigh that?

I bloomingwell hate the compromises we have to make that impact on our kids because of delays in the system, it sucks.

justaboutWILLfinishherthesis · 25/06/2011 21:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EllenJaneisnotmyname · 25/06/2011 21:48

I see. I didn't know if you wanted him to start anyway. I suppose without the right sort of support it might have set an unwanted precedent.

Starchart · 25/06/2011 22:06

tbh I'm not sure what we are going to do. He has ASD. Without appropriate support he won't even be aware of the other children, let alone make friends with them so its a bit immaterial.

If his only chance of making friends is in Jan after the tribunal then he may as well wait until then and we can have some fun and term time holidays in the meantime.

OP posts:
EllenJaneisnotmyname · 25/06/2011 22:17

Lots of children don't start til Jan. He's not going to make friends without appropriate support, so I wouldn't lose sleep over that. It'll give you a chance to have some transition visits with his actual class before Jan.

Starchart · 25/06/2011 22:21

Also if he goes in befoer Jan, they'll just fabricate evidence that he is managing without specified support.

OP posts:
EllenJaneisnotmyname · 25/06/2011 22:22

That's what I meant by unwanted precedent, really! Grin

tiredoffightingwithjelly · 25/06/2011 22:24

I agree it will be good to have some transition meetings and fun and holidays in the meantime sounds good to me. They've named the school and you can work with the school in the meantime and build up that relationship too.

Hope the LA see sense sooner and you don't have to go to tribunal.

Starchart · 25/06/2011 22:28

Hmm, not really. The school won't want our proposed provision, but we're only going for it because we have to go to tribunal anyway, we may as well lay it all out!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page