Hi
Following on from finding out that ds's school has kept pretty much zero evidence of SEN support - even down to missing IEPs
, the lovely ASD teacher and myself are currently trying to draw up a list of possible interventions and supports that the school have put in place, will have evidence of - somewhere - and we might be able to find if we and the new SENCO dig deep enough.
She explained to me that we need to prove:
a) evidence of support/intervention provided, with evidence that it has worked but is not sustainable within the school's SEN budget
b) evidence of support/intervention provided that hasn't worked, because more of the same or a slightly different approach requiring additional funding would be needed to get the desired results
c) evidence of ds's needs
The statement is going to be for social rather than academic/learning issues, as the feeling amongst all of the professionals involved with ds, is that we have plenty of evidence of his capability of being a high achiever, but that his lack of social skills and resultant anxiety have become a huge barrier to his achievement and progress. He has effectively stalled. As far as anyone can tell and based on his performance up until the summer term of year 2, he has no actual learning disabilities, his issues either relate to his social/communication skills, sensory issues or physical problems relating to his hypotonia.
I have twice raised my concerns about his achievement levels with his teachers, only to have them gloss over it. At the meeting with the ASD Inclusion lady on Monday, she said they are now saying he is currently working at level 3 in year 4.
He was working at level 3 in year 2 ffs, yet every time I've suggested his progress had stalled I was stonewalled.
Fundamentally, because he wasn't 'behind' for his age they didn't care that he had made no progress in two years and have fudged the assessments to cover it up.
She also agreed with me that they can't back this up effectively, because essentially ds has no work to assess, due to his inability to start, let alone remain on task. He basically has exercise books full of blank pages - something else we have endlessly raised with his teachers both this year and last.
So they can't possibly know his current levels, because they have no work to assess and my feeling is that he has actually slipped back rather than just stalled - at least in literature and maths.
We have gone from having a child at the top of every subject all through infants, who hit juniors, stopped progressing, then started to slide and not one of the teachers cared enough to raise it as a problem, let alone try and address it. 
Anyway, sorry I've gone off on a bit of a rant. Back to my question:
Obviously what we want for him is as much 1-2-1 as we can get. He needs someone to meet and greet and run through the day with him in every morning and definitely someone 1-2-1 for literacy and mathematics and preferably for any other subjects involving a lot of written work.
So, does anyone know exactly what type of evidence are they going to be looking for to prove that he needs that 1-2-1?
Has anyone else successfully got a statement for their dc that was primarily social/communication based and if so, what evidence did you supply that you felt helped fight his corner?
Sorry, I'm being a bit vague here. Still trying to wrap my head around Monday's revelation and also ridiculously tired. Basically, any advice on this would be gratefully received. I feel a bit like I'm standing on a ledge and thrashing around in the dark at the moment. 