Trying to get a better diagnosis for ds who is 4.3 and has cp. So saw neurologist this week.
Official diagnosis is gdd and has caused various problems with NHS and getting statement. Lawyer advised us we really need a better diagnosis to ease things in future when fighting for therapy / equipment and for future reviews.
So asked neurologist for cp diagnosis to be told only way he would do that was following a MRI scan to confirm damage and rule out anything progressive that would mimic cp.
Can't believe this is the only way to get a cp diagnosis tbh.
Anyway despite going round and round in circles he wouldn't tell me what those progressive conditions might be and refused to budge from his stance.
Gut feeling is that this is ridiculous. Couldn't care a jot about "findings". Just want the cp diagnosis. Feel no GA should be entered into frivolously. There will always be some risk and this is probably another NHS tickbox exercise.
However ds has a dislocated hip as he was left hanging by the NHS (told to come back if any further concerns after hip reviewed 2 years ago). A second opinion said the time to sort it out on a muscular level was 2 years ago! So now he's waiting for a date for bone surgery which might have been avoided. Anyway, my point is if I'd known I wouldn't have been fobbed off 2 years ago when I knew his hips weren't as they should be. To my eyes his hips haven't changed massively in the 2 years (but I'm not medically qualified). They were never right and they still aren't.
So ....! Is there anything that would mimic cp that's so serious it would need nipping in the bud? Neurologist wouldn't elaborate despite going round in circles for an hour.
Hate to put ds through a GA without knowing the risks / potential conditions etc.... and making a considered decision.
Refused an MRI in past because felt it wouldn't change his treatment. (It shouldn't. But does in reality. Or it would do if anyone did anything to help!)