I'm assuming it's not the same as a qualified SALT.
Have just noticed that dd's SALT report from school a few years ago was undertaken by someone with the said title. No further action was taken at the time. Three years down the line, no progress and today we went to see a SALT which we have paid for privately (I want to leave no stone unturned), and she was stunned to see that the report is under the SALT heading as a SALT report, but has been done by someone who appears not to be a SALT, which imo is somewhat misleading. I had no idea until my attention was drawn to this today!!!
Also, she was surprised at some of the previous results given dd's assesment today.
We have another appt next week as fatigue set in and the assessment couldn't be completed today - also, dd is a bit snuffly, so her actual hearing wasn't good today, so the test will be repeated.
Is it unreasonable to be a bit cross about this, or would it have made no difference who did the original assessment. Is it possible a technician could've missed something?