Ooooh,baka,one to get my juices flowing!
I'd be happy to contribute extensively.
Agree with all your points.
Also like to add that responsibilities of parents,education and salt need to be clearly set out before embarking on something like this (some sort of contract) because it all becomes a bit of a grey area with everyone expecting everyone else to do things. (I'm talking stuff like laminating,velcroing and so on.)
I have posted in the past at my frustration with spending hours cutting,gluing and so on,while classroom assistants sit back.
Not that I am too grand to do this stuff-on the contrary!I will pitch in with whatever needs doing,no matter what it is.
However it is such a waste of me as a rare resource.
Parents need to know how much is expected from them too. Sadly,I have met very few families who put in as much effort as I think they should. (Sorry if that sounds harsh,but as the parent of a comm. impaired child,I take on a huge amount of responsibility for her-as I should. She is my child after all.)
The Makaton issue is one I've tussled with for years.People seem to love or hate Margaret Walker's way of doing things. I understand the reason why the company want to maintain control for reasons of uniformity and consistency of standars but i am really unhappy with the idea of effectively patenting a method of communication.
I also run baby sing & sign groups and we use a generic system-probably Signalong really.
Eidsvold's comments re Hanen are interesting. Think stuff like this and signing generally seem to work best with kids with good pregmatic skills (just an informal observation.)
You do need someone skilled to match a system to a comm. method at an early age,also to monitor and if ness. switch.
I'm really bothered about R3's therapist discouraging the family's use of sign? Why R3? have you had a reason or is it because she doesn't know enough about it??
Salts are shaky on stuff they bare not trained in-like everyone. Went to see an old PECS sceptic salt colleague the other day. Happily she is more into it (done the course twice) but she still said
'Oh I can't be bothered with that 4 step error correction stuff. I figure they'll get it eventually.'
WTF??! It made me really angry.
So lesson is..question your salt on her area of expertise. Has she been trained in PECS (2 day course at least,not just flicking through amanual)?Makaton???
You deserve to know and actually you are doing the salt service a favour if you reject bad service.Maybe then we will have more money poured into it (in my dept.we often all have to chip in from our own pockets if someone wants to attend a course as there is no money left.)
Will watch this one with great interest.