Agree, Moondog - they don't want their systems to be measured, and fear measurement, because their own ways of educating autistic kids will be found wanting - except for with very high functioning kids (who'd have done well, whatever the intervention).
I think there is also some very muddle-headed, patronising thinking that now pervades our SEN "industry" - along the following rough lines:
"It is wrong to discriminate against disabled children. Who's to say we should try and make autistic kids "normal" - their reality is just as valid as ours. Therefore people who do ABA and try and "normalise" or "socialise" their children are cruel - let the poor wee boy spend his whole day/week/lifetime stimming away, if that's what his autism needs".
I have just one question to ask when people feed me this guff - trying to make out that THEY care more about my boy than me:
What happens when I'm dead?
If I have not attempted to socialise him, such that he is able to take part in mainstream life, then he has no choice but an institutionalised existence when I'm gone.
If I didn't stop him bouncing, hand-flapping and saying "eeeeeee" when he was 2, via ABA techniques, then he would never have been allowed in a mainstream classroom (too disruptive), or a cafe, or a cinema.
Eventually, as he grows too big to control, he would not go out at all.
People would be scared of the 6 ft 5, 36 year old man, screaming an EEEEEEE noise and jumping up and down alarmingly.
No-one would be able to control him (because nothing was done at an early age) so people on the street would fear him, carers would not be able to keep him safe. He would probably be drugged 24/7. Yobs would likely take the piss out of him if he did venture out on the streets, or beat him up.
He would end up staying in his institution all day.
So the very people who call me cruel, would have pretty much put him in a prison for life with their well-meaning, patronising attitude.
They are confused, bless them - it is not discrinatory or cruel to try and get my son as socialised and independent as is possible, given his fairly severe autism - it is best for him, gives him the best chance of a full life. Gives him truly equal opportunity,despite his disability.
Of course it's way HARDER AND MORE EXPENSIVE to do ABA than to do TEACCH, which is the real reason behind the anti-ABA stuff - but they dress it up with the muddle-headed thinking above.
Sorry, one of my pet rants!