I've spent bloody ages on this parental statement and it's now 45 pages long.
I'm trying to pull together all the salient evidence from reports which supports what we are saying and identify areas which have failed to be explored - like the LA EP's dismally poor report which identifies very poor working memory with no strategy to deal with it (her report in facts lacks any comment on provision for the list of recommendations she makes).
I suppose provision is the key concern. The reports are generally poor at commenting on what is needed to achieve progress or even meet the recommendations. For example, the EP's report simply lists three pages of recommendations but doesn't say what is needed in terms of provision to carry them out.
I know SEN COP is clear about identifying provision in reports and I know that experts are supposed to consider future needs as well as present (which of course they don't) so I have dealt wiht all that.
My question is, should I pull the recommendations from the reports together and comment on provision, even just to say something like 'the provision required to achieve adequate progress must be clearly specified and quantified', where no comment is made by the relevant expert?