Just had a response from ds's new school in reply to my letter asking how they were going to meet his needs without a statement and a note in lieu.
All along the school told me that would support my request for a statement. When i got the note in lieu, i phoned SENCO and asked would they be able to meet his needs without a statement. She told me if it included one to one then he couldnt have any one to one without a statement. She asked if i would appeal it and i said i was considering it.
The note in lieu states that ds will require one to one. The SALT and EP states that ds will require one to one, all advice sought by LA as part of the SA.
Anyhow i then wrote to school and asked them to reply in writing (expecting she would write what she told me verbally, no one to one without a statement)
She has written to say she feels they can meet ds's needs from school resources and then lists the help they give, which is exactly the same as the help he already gets in his IEP. No one to one.
She finishes the letter I hope you are reassured that we will be able to meet ds's needs even without a statement, however, if you do feel that you want to appeal the decision, we will support you in this decision.
Im fairly new to this statementing buisness, but are the school saying we are under the koosh of the LA, so lets speak in code here? 
Do i now take the lack of provision up with the school or the LA?