I saw the EP today who did some tests with DS for the SA.
She asked me what I wanted her to do with him and whether I wanted her to do a full scale IQ test. The alternative was to some other bits and pieces which would higlight strengths and weaknesses as well as bits of the IQ test.
I must admit, I'm always so wary of these people and immediately thought - what's the catch. I asked her what the downside to not IQ testing and she said if it went to Tribual and she got asked why she hadn't done it, she would say she wasn't asked to.
Very odd response. I said she should do what she thought was professionally appropriate and correct. So she agreed that she would prefer to look at strengths and weaknesses. She would put in her report that this was agreed.
DS really struggled on some of the communication stuff and she said she felt he needed SALT which he isn't getting at present. He also struggled to follow whaht she was saying sometimes. Lots of 'eh' or 'what' and her having to repeat things. Not so easy to do that in class.
She thought he needed OT and SALT but I kind of think she didn't see she had much of a role.
I think this is probably right and that's what he would need a statement for.
Shhe said her report doesn't automatically come to me but goes to panel and I have to request it. Is that right?