DS is in Yr6 so we're looking at secondary transition. He has AS and everyone agrees that he can't go to mainstream - even the LEA. He has very challenging behaviour, a lot of anxiety and sensory issues, has been excluded numerous times. However, he's very bright, EP has said his IQ is in top 2%. He's on NC level 3-4 for all subjects (lower for literacy), his teachers say he would probably be higher if he hadn't missed so much school and if he took part in lessons instead of refusing.
The LEA have recommended that I look at a particular special school in the borough. I've arranged a visit and have read website, Ofsted etc. It has an Outstanding Ofsted and sounds like it's very caring, structured. It takes a range of SN - ASDs, physical, sensory, EBD etc. However, I'm concerned about the level of ability in the school. The LEA said that it takes a range of ability and teaches up to GCSE. But the exam results from the website says 0% got 1 GCSE A-C, although some of them got 1 GCSE A-G (in the past three years). In other words, the brightest pupils there are capable of getting 1 GCSE D-G. Their KS3 results put most pupils on level 3 or 4, which is what DS is already on now.
I get the feeling that they are going to name this school on his statement. The LEA officer said that he could be taught GCSEs separately by going to a mainstream for some subjects or by a tutor coming in to see him. But this sounds very disruptive and DS really struggles with change. Am I right to be concerned about this? In some ways I can see how the school would be good for his emotional needs, it sounds very nurturing and structured. But could he be happy there if he is with other pupils whose ability is that much below his?