Can you clarify your situation?
Has the EHCP been finalised with section I blank or just the type of placement named? If so, did you appeal?
Or have you not had a finalised EHCP with the placement for September yet?
If that’s the case and DD has an existing EHCP but the LA breached the 15th Feb deadline for naming placements for phase transfer and still haven’t finalised, you should email the Director of Children’s Services reminding them of their duty and threatening Judicial Review. At the same time, you should look for someone with the capacity to take on your case for a pre-action letter.
If you haven’t got a finalised EHCP with the placement for September yet and DD didn’t have an existing EHCP/the EHCP is new and has not been finalised yet, what week are you on?
The maximum recommended travel time for primary is 45mins each way. Although some travel further. If your DD can’t travel that far, do you have evidence? Is it 1 hour straight there or is it only that long because it would be shared transport?
What is your preferred placement? Is it the school who has said they are full? If so, what type of school is it? Unless it is wholly independent, on its own, being full is not a sufficient reason for the LA to refuse to name it.
Previously, because most units are not separate institutions, when a child was placed in a unit within a school, the mainstream school would be named in section I with the provision provided by the unit included in F. However, there was case law earlier this year showing in some situations it can be lawful to name the unit (hub in that case) in I.