We had the first part of DD's autism diagnostic sessions today. It was over Zoom. DD, 11, joined for the first half hour, then next hour and a half was me answering the clinician's questions. I feel frustrated bc they said things like 'oh, your child liked imaginative play when they were small? That's not typical of autistic individuals'. It feels like the process just proliferates stereotypes, and is especially not helpful where girls are concerned (no, she doesn't have any unusual interests in public transport or hoovers -- they didn't ask that specifically, but I think deep interests for girls can present differently). There are so many super creative autistic people in the world!
I've been raising flags about possible ASD for years. Primary school insisted 'she's fine' and sent her off to secondary with no support, which has made Y7 a nightmare. She has lots of the social communication and sensory indicators, anxiety, rigid thinking, difficulty with change. OK, she doesn't have strict rituals or obsessive interests, and the clinician today did say that it's a spectrum so not everyone has everything, but by the end of the session I felt deflated.
The clinicians like to ask, 'What difference will a diagnosis make?' I hate that question. Would they ask someone concerned about being diabetic what difference a diagnosis would make? It would explain things and enable us to get our child the support they need. Now I feel like despite all the evidence we've lived through the past 11 years, they might do the ADOS next week and tell us she doesn't meet the threshold and isn't autistic. I guess I've come to see it as part of her identity in a way, too.
Am I worrying too much about this?