I have a video from 2001 where his private prep school teacher talks about my son’s poor behaviour for 15 minutes. She discusses him in depth and his exceptional academic abilities but poor social skills and general behaviour and inattentiveness and laughs at his running skills (lack of). Roll on 21 years later. My son struggled at A levels, dropped out of Uni, was depressed and extremely unhappy and not practicing self care. He put on large amounts of weight, started to gamble and spend money he didn't have after leaving the confines of primary and secondary education.
After writing about him on Mumsnet a year ago someone mentioned he might have ADHD. We then started to look into this and he does indeed have severe inattentive ADHD and is now on 70mg of Elvanse a day. This person changed my son’s life.
The reason for suing the school would be the clear behaviour from the teacher talking about my son and his issues but never offering any resolution or possible reasons for his behaviour. His ‘wilderness years’ were between the ages of 18 and 26. If he had managed to stay at Uni he would have had a business degree at the age of 21. So he would sue for loss of earnings between 21 and 26 years old due to negligence.
Any thoughts?