Hi
DD aged 12 has had difficulties transitioning to secondary school, and is struggling to write things down, make notes etc. She also reads aloud in a halting manner. She learnt to read very easily in reception but writing (putting things down on paper, rather than handwriting itself) never came as easily. Her standard of work in comparison with her peers probably drifted downwards during primary, but there is a marked drop in secondary. Spelling and handwriting is OK.
We had her assessed by an educational psychologist who found working memory (particularly auditory memory) and to a lesser extent processing issues. However she assessed her literacy skills as average for her age, so said she was not dyslexic.
As part of the assessment the EP thought she had eye tracking issues so we visited a behavioural optometrist. The BO did an extensive assessment and clearly thought she was dyslexic (in addition to some "functional" eye issues). When I pointed out the EP had said she wasn't, she said that it may well be in a few years if reassessed she would be diagnosed with dyslexia as she is assessed against chronological age, so if she fails to keep up then she will meet the threshold. She also said DD had developed a lot of coping mechanisms.
I don't think BOs are qualified to diagnose dyslexia, but she's obviously experienced. Is it right that you have to actually have a deficit in literacy before you can be defined as dyslexic, rather than just a particular profile, or traits? Any thoughts or experience welcome.