“It’s focussing on a low fat, high carb diet.”
Hmm… it’s low fat, it’s only high carb if you eat a lot of carbs - that’s a choice though.
“It doesn’t teach you about the nutritional value of food because calorie counting is ‘bad’. It values shit like muller lights.”
Well it doesn’t value shit like muller lights, if people prefer to use syns on those over chocolate, wine or whatever, again, that’s a choice.
It should teach you the basics of nutrition too tbh, everything is there in the pack, your low calorie veg is a better choice than carby ones, foods high in protein are marked because they’re the ones you want to go for next after the non carby veg, foods high in calcium are marked as that… it says foods like avocado and nuts are nutritious and healthy but just too high in oil and calories to be in with the free foods.
“if you want that chocolate enough to use 200 calories on it and you can eat the chocolate you want, rather than another bloody curly wurly.”
200 calories of chocolate is 10 syns worth… no reason you couldn’t have had that instead of a curly wurly… some people prefer 2 curly wurlys over a bar of actual chocolate, but that’s the same decision with calorie counting.
Some people get on better with calorie counting, some people get on better with slimming world… just depends what you prefer…
but that description of slimming world is like me saying calorie counting encourages you to eat smaller portions of junk food instead and replace meals with chocolate because it’s the same calories instead of making changes to how you eat and cook because that’s how I worked calorie counting when I tried it.