I'm still bfing DS (12mo) when we go to bed at 10.30ish. About half the time it's a dreamfeed and about half the time he's woken up and started crying. I don't mind doing it at all and it feels like good insurance against him waking at 12 or 1am which happened the few times I tried not doing it (but months ago)
But I'm also trying to stop feeding him overnight at all (see other thread on 'going to stop tonight') so I'm wondering whether I'm confusing him about 'the new rules' by feeding him after he's gone to sleep and woken up. Although it seems quite different to me because I haven't been woken up, to him it must be the same - he was asleep, he wakes up and is unhappy to be awake, he wants to bf cos that's his favourite form of comfort and easiest way to get back to sleep. How come the first time this happens he gets a bf and then after that he only gets Daddy however much he makes it clear that he wants to bf?!
But then I think this is too much to try and change at once. Not feeding him between 10.30 and 6.30 is hard enough for all of us, without adding in another hurdle.
But would it make it clearer to him what's going on? Or do babies this young not have the cognitive capacity for this sort of thing anyway?
I also worry that he would be hungry without that feed. He's not a big solids eater and is still on 5 - 6 bfs in 24 hrs. His bedtime feed at 6.30ish is often tiny cos he's only just had tea (has to have tea either too early at 4.45 or too late at 6pm on work days due to car sharing complications). The 10.30pm feed is usually better and makes me feel confident that he is not hungry when he wakes at 2 /3 / 4 whatever.
I think maybe I'm talking myself round to not trying to stop this as well. But I'd be very interested to hear any contrary experiences or opinions!