Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Do you really charge for webchats, MN? I would like Gabrielle Palmer, please

19 replies

hunkermunker · 05/08/2009 20:33

See this thread for more info

OP posts:
AnarchyAunt · 05/08/2009 20:34

Ah you beat me to it! I was just going to start this thread.

So do all the politicians and yummy mummy types have to pay for the webchats? Even Daisy Goodwin? Shurely not....

HelenMumsnet · 05/08/2009 20:48

Thanks for the suggestion, hunker.

Anyone else second (or third) that?

hunkermunker · 05/08/2009 20:51

I'll take that as a yes then, HM (I DO like your initials, you know ).

Don't charge Gabrielle Palmer though, please, for she is fantastic. We'll have a whipround on the breast/bottle topic

OP posts:
AnarchyAunt · 07/08/2009 11:35

I second and third that.

primigravida · 07/08/2009 11:44

I would also to have her on for a web-chat, please.

bamboo · 07/08/2009 11:48

I'll add my name too.

LOL, though, at Daisy Goodwin paying for that slating. Perhaps she was being charged by the word and that's why she answered so few questions!

Threadworm · 07/08/2009 12:00

A month or so ago Justine said that MNHQ would try to make it clear when webchats had been paid for. I'd really like to know for each webchat whether it was a paid-for promo or a different kind of conversation -- just so I could avoid participating in an advert.

Threadworm · 07/08/2009 16:07

Not that there is anything wrong with a paid-for spot.

It's just that there ought to be a strong visible distinction between content that stands or falls on its merits, and content with a presence that has been paid for.

Just like newspapers have to write 'Advertising Feature' or something similar on advertising copy that has been made to resemble a news story.

hunkermunker · 07/08/2009 18:55

I agree there should be a clear notice when it's a paid-for advert. I guess the Waitrose one was paid-for (and so it ought to have been).

But Gabrielle Palmer? Really, really NO, it would seem nigh on immoral to charge her!

OP posts:
HelenMumsnet · 08/08/2009 11:28

Hello.

Yes, we do try to make it clear when our webchats are sponsored - see the OP on our recent webchat with Chris Corcoran, for example.

And GP is already added to the list of your webchat requests...

dizzydixies · 08/08/2009 11:33

am still waiting on Graham Norton from when the Eurovision was on

HelenMumsnet · 08/08/2009 11:35

I know, I know

We're still trying...

dizzydixies · 08/08/2009 11:39

I can cope as long as its not been forgotten about

hunkermunker · 08/08/2009 20:53

"And GP is already added to the list of your webchat requests..."

You make it sound like I'm requesting a different person every day, HM

I don't, do I? I'm not sleep-requesting-web-chats again, am I?!

OP posts:
onepieceoflollipop · 08/08/2009 21:02

I was fortunate enough to hear her speak live once at a conference. (I didn't know who she was at that point )

She was absolutely fantastic, a real inspiration and passionate. Many of the delegates (who did know who she was ) were cheering and encouraging her in a v enthusiastic manner.

HelenMumsnet · 08/08/2009 22:02

That's interesting, onepieceoflollipop - we'd like a webchat where everyone whooped and applauded afterwards!

Sorry, HM, didn't mean it to sound like that. Came over all clipped and harassed, didn't I? Can't think why...

hunkermunker · 08/08/2009 22:05

I would beat people to death if they didn't whoop and applaud, HM. No charge

No worries, you know you're my v favourite MNHQer

And yes Go To Bed, children [stern]

OP posts:
onepieceoflollipop · 08/08/2009 22:18

The whooping etc might not be the same as in rl because you only permit us a woefully limited number of emoticons atm

hunkermunker · 08/08/2009 22:36

WHP?!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page