Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Announcement re deletion of Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce threads

871 replies

carrie (mumsnet) · 13/01/2005 13:15

Dear mumsnetters,

We are now able to shed a bit more light as to what actually occurred re the Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce episode. We are pretty sure (having received a confession of as much) that, as some of you suspected, W&R/JF was a non-lawyer masquerading as a QC. Given this knowledge we have deleted the relevant postings and banned the user from the site.

If nothing else the whole business is a salutary reminder that you can never be completely sure that folks are who they say they are and neither should you necessarily completely trust the advice, especially "professional" advice, posted on mumsnet.

As a result of some concerns raised by you we are looking into making parts of the site, the swaps and weight loss clubs for example, something that operates via mumsnet HQ so that people's addresses are not being circulated. If anyone has any other suggestions then please [email protected] or post them here and we promise to consider them.

We?d also remind folks that when organising meet ups you should take the same precautions you would when meeting anyone from the net - make sure you meet in a public place and that others know where you are going.

Having said all that, it would be a shame if this relatively rare occurrence of someone pretending to be someone they are not changed the warm, supportive, welcoming and caring atmosphere on mumsnet - and we're confident that you won't let it!

Thanks for all the supportive and helpful emails we've received from so many of you.

Carrie, Rachel and Justine

OP posts:
jampots · 13/01/2005 21:36

If I were a troll and posted something to another Mner I certainly wouldnt put a return address on the parcel, and if I was bullied into doing it by the woman at the Post Office I would make one up.

milge · 13/01/2005 21:36

Anyway, she is a he, not a QC, not living in Llandaff,but in Tonypandy, but he did keep a promise to send a toy on to sparklymieow, so some good has come of it!

Demented · 13/01/2005 21:36

Just seen your post Disslocated. I used to do the weigh-ins for MN Mamas and I must confess to still having a few e-mail addresses in my address book. I will go through them and delete all those who I am not in regular contact with anymore.

Just in case anyone is concerned the only time I have used the MN Mamas e-mail addresses is when we were collecting vouchers/new home cards etc for Nutty and have never used them for any dodgy purposes!

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:37

furball, if you put steve-schindler.co.uk into the Who is search box here , you get an address with that postcode.

DissLocated · 13/01/2005 21:38

Thanks LM. I've been a bit twitchy about security since this whole thing blew up!

Demented · 13/01/2005 21:39

If you get any big willy e-mails in your in-box they are not from me, OK!

galaxy · 13/01/2005 21:39

that's interesting.

miggy · 13/01/2005 21:42

you could put any old return address on a parcel though. If He knew steve S, or got address from his site-not necc his own address at all

RTKangaMummy · 13/01/2005 21:42

would it be a good idea for everyone with addresses of fellow mumsnetters to agree to delete or destroy them

DissLocated · 13/01/2005 21:43

No big willies in my box

(can't believe I just posted that )

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:43

oh no, kanga!

sparklymieow · 13/01/2005 21:44

yes please,

secur · 13/01/2005 21:44

Message withdrawn

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:44

we have to have some trust! most of us trust most of us and that's fine - most of us deserve trusting. it would be tragic if JF destroyed that.

aloha · 13/01/2005 21:47

I've just finished watching Judge John Deed (when he said something about a 'fine malt' I was shrieking with joy) - and nearly choked laughing at Moomin's Ladieesnet post. Oh, the sheer joy of it. Do you know, Steve/Jane/W&R/JF, the laughs these threads have given me (esp Twig's Please Don't Post On THIS Thread) has made it all worthwhile for me. So I thank you, you sick little troll.

charleypops · 13/01/2005 21:48

What's a troll please?

Gobbledigook · 13/01/2005 21:50

Holy s**t - have I got this right???

I go away for merely a week and someone I really liked turns out to be a 'faker'? So, so shocked.

I'm off to find out what happened with JimJams.

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:51

Hello, GDG! Have you finished moving?

You won't find much, JF's posts have gorn.

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:52

Jimjams's haven't though

Gobbledigook · 13/01/2005 21:52

Hee hee!! Hi JanH! Missed you lot the last week! Move went fine thanks!

CountessDracula · 13/01/2005 21:54

Aloha I was wondering if W&R's legal expertise was based upon close study of the application of the law in Judge John Deed (which has dh and I scoffing on the sofa every time!)

lavenderr · 13/01/2005 21:54

have just checked if a Schindler lives in Tonypandy and quoted CF40 they said there was nothing here, only Newport (maybe the return address given was false...if a troll the real identity would not want to be revealed surely)..

PuffTheMagicDragon · 13/01/2005 21:55

ok, this is moving so fast, I'm not sure what is truth or fact anymore.

I know w&r is definitely not the legal eagle they claimed to be (confirmed by mumsnet).

What else is definitely not true?

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:55

There is a searchparty out for you and your mum you know!

JanH · 13/01/2005 21:55

(GDG that was to)