Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Heads up: some academic research taking place

664 replies

RowanMumsnet · 30/08/2018 16:53

Hello

Some researchers from a UK university are going to be collecting posts from some boards on Mumsnet over the next few weeks. They will be looking only at posts published from this point onwards. Selected posts will be anonymised (ie usernames will not be stored anywhere), and all processes will be GDPR-compliant.

EDITED BY MNHQ: to be clear, NO private or back-end data is being shared with the researchers and they will have NO access to any extra information about users. They will only be analysing published posts, ie things that are already in the public domain.

The researchers will analyse the text of the anonymised posts as part of their study. The full text of these anonymised posts will not be reproduced in the study - no pieces of text that make you or your situation identifiable will be published.

Once the study is complete, the database containing the anonymised posts will be destroyed.

Obviously we'd love to tell you what the study is about - but we can't because it will skew the results. However once the research has been completed we'll share it with you and you can read all about it. The academics running the study are people we've worked with before, and the topic is one we think lots of MN users will agree is interesting and useful.

IMPORTANT BIT: if you DO NOT want your posts to be considered for inclusion in the research, please shout here on this thread or email us on [email protected]

And of course let us know if you have any questions and we'll see if we can answer them.

Thanks

MNHQ

OP posts:
GladAllOver · 20/09/2018 17:06

No one needs your consent.

Jux · 20/09/2018 17:17

It would be interesting if there was some research which compared random posts by people who didn't consent and random posts by people who didn't care. Random posts across the site that is. Because no one needs consent to do that.

That would be amusing Grin

IdahoJones · 20/09/2018 17:21

I've already done it.

delphguelph · 21/09/2018 02:14

Wonder what the research will be used for?

AuntieStella · 21/09/2018 07:35

If it's analysing how subject matter influences vocabulary selection or some other aspect of fitting language to situation, it'll not really be much use in itself (which applies to a lot of research in linguistics!)

Look ing at trends in how people use language is nter sting in itself, and might inform those who wish to refine certain communications. So it could get picked up be someone who works in advertising or PR, but - as pointed out repeatedly - that sort of analysis of what people post publically goes on all the time.

MeltingWax · 21/09/2018 08:24

I have a theory that this is actually the aim of the research project...getting MN to post this and then analyse the responses. There is no other 'research project'. This is it. Grin

onlyoakfurniture · 21/09/2018 10:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Jux · 21/09/2018 12:35

onlyoakfurniture are you referring to the awfully embarrassing grammatical errors?

BIWI · 21/09/2018 13:31

Oh bore off spammer!

Oh, and creating a profile for yourself doesn't make you any less of one.

GladAllOver · 21/09/2018 18:26

onlyoakfurnitureare you referring to the awfully embarrassing grammatical errors?

Or the fact that they call themselves onlyoak but they sell other wood as well?
They are off my buying list for sure.

tealover99 · 22/09/2018 12:40

Opting out, don't include my posts, thanks.

Justwanttoweeinpeace · 22/09/2018 18:53

This thread is extraordinary. What makes anyone think that this site isn't analysed all the time by all sorts of companies for a million different reasons, many of which you may not agree with.

MN can't possibly control all of this activity and given that this is a public forum, why should they?

If you don't want your public comments on a public forum being read by all and sundry, why are you here?

IdahoJones · 22/09/2018 21:40

Maybe the research is how many times the same points keep getting repeated in posts.

GladAllOver · 22/09/2018 21:45

Or how many times the same posts are ignored.

BIWI · 23/09/2018 08:37
Grin
IdahoJones · 23/09/2018 15:46

Or how many times the same posts are both repeated and ignored

grumiosmum · 25/09/2018 07:49

@RowanMumsnet if the intention is to make us all aware of this you're not doing a great job. I am a very frequent & regular user of MN & have only just spotted this post - almost a month after it was posted. If the data may be mined from any Board on MN, you need to pin this post onto every Board too. Or at least the most popular ones.

BIWI · 25/09/2018 08:49

Really? It's been in active convos many, many times! You're clearly not putting in enough MN hours Wink

tlove · 25/09/2018 10:06

Everyone's moaning but they are posting on a public board in the first place Hmm

grumiosmum · 25/09/2018 12:06

Yes really BIWI. And believe me I spend far too much time on here as it is ... Blush

grumiosmum · 25/09/2018 12:07

I'd also suggest the headline isn't explicit enough. Most people will think it's an invitation to do a survey & not bother to click on the thread & find out what it's about.

SLoisachtal · 25/09/2018 13:58

grumiosmum, I agree with BIWI. This thread was 'stickied' by MNHQ when they started it on 30th Aug - very obvious. The title was enough for me to click on the thread back then, even though I haven't commented previously.

RubbishRobotFromTheDawnOfTime · 25/09/2018 14:03

This is normal way to conduct research. It's publicly available open source data.

What do people think is going to happen? They are not interested in what any one particular poster says. They're analysing patterns of language use in a particular topic. Nobody is even going to be reading your whole sentences. The database will have no information on it that isn't already on MN!

Previously psychological research has been carried out on sites like MN to investigate attitudes to breastfeeding. There is no invasion of privacy. MN do not have to seek permission for this. They're just being polite.

grumiosmum · 25/09/2018 15:59

Fair enough SLoisachtal but your experience was different to mine.

I rarely look at site stuff - only visiting it now because the paragraph thingy went wrong - but look at Active convos nearly every day, sometimes several times a day, and this was the first time I'd noticed this.

SLoisachtal · 25/09/2018 16:03

grumiosmum, but it's also been 'stickied' in Chat for the same length of time, as far as I'm aware.

Swipe left for the next trending thread