Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Would it be possible to have active convs with No miscarriage/bereavements?????

4 replies

drosophila · 10/01/2007 08:03

It's not that I want to deny people who are grieving the chance to express themselves it's just that I find it so heart wrenching to read the titles never mind the thread itself.

I am trying to deal with 3 bereavements in 3 years and I am particularily sensitive. I am trying to bury my head in the sand I know but this is how I am trying to cope.

OP posts:
2shoes · 10/01/2007 08:40

Surely it should be treated with the same respect as sn and taken out of acrive convos

drosophila · 10/01/2007 08:44

Didn't know it had been. Was there a reason for this?

OP posts:
JustineMumsnet · 10/01/2007 13:11

Hi drosophila,
On balance we think it wouldn't be best to take miscarriage and bereavement out of active conversations because generally if people post about in this topic they are looking for support and being in active conversations means that's more likely. We do understand that some thread titles can be upsetting but tbh if we started deleting things on that basis it would get hard to know where to draw the line. I hope you can see where we are coming from - so sorry you've been upset.

ps the reason for the SN move is outlined in our post on this thread

drosophila · 10/01/2007 20:22

Just a bad morning I think. I did wonder that if allowing people to omit it from their active conversations people would lose a voice.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread