Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Lads' mags have 6 weeks to "cover up": your reaction, please!

289 replies

HelenMumsnet · 29/07/2013 09:58

Hello.

You may already have seen/heard the news today that the Co-op has given "lads' mags" six weeks to cover up their front page with sealed "modesty bags" or be taken off sale in its stores.

The Co-op says it's responding to concerns by its members, customers and colleagues about images of scantily-clad women on magazine covers.

We're being asked what Mumsnetters think of this move by the Co-op. So we'd love you to let us know: please do post up your views on this thread.

OP posts:
Pan · 29/07/2013 17:55

Well, without wishing to crush your soft porn career before it has begun, AF.....would men/women pay to view your boobs, AF? Outside of a niche market?

GrimmaTheNome · 29/07/2013 17:56

Or are being deliberately obtuse?

DownstairsMixUp · 29/07/2013 17:57

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

AnyFucker · 29/07/2013 17:58

uughh @ "niche market"

Perhaps Saga magazine would consider me. For 10p or summat Smile

Everybody has a price, in this commodifying world.

GoshAnneGorilla · 29/07/2013 18:02

Good. These magazines are just vile, depressing objectification of women.

I found it hugely amusing to find a sign for erection dysfunction medication dysfunction on the shelf for these magazines in Tesco.

Pan · 29/07/2013 18:04

Thought you might like that.

We are a sentient being. We aren't ameoba-like. We apply discrimination and judgements and are open to influences, esp when young. So yes, in view of that, context, for humans, is everything.

Interesting, when I am in supermarkets or even our local shop I have never actually seen anyone buying these items. Wonder why that is?

GrimmaTheNome · 29/07/2013 18:04

Excellent product placement, Gosh!

countingmyblessings · 29/07/2013 18:06

Fantastic! I don't want my ds growing up thinking beauty only comes in one form - ie. plastic, gravity defying boobs, calfornian tan, bubble butt & so on. Nor do I think it's healthy for young girls to be exposed to the 'meat market'. Soft porn is still porn.Aspiring to be/look like a tart is all too common these days. No wonder our kids are growing up too fast.

NewsyAgent123 · 29/07/2013 18:11

I am a newsagent and have actively made arrangements in my shop so that youngsters cannot view the "top shelf" and "lads" magazines for some time. I fully support your campaign and wish that all the magazines were available in "wrapped" versions, some are already but not enough. Its a good thing that the Co-op are responding to this, but at the end of the day it is ultimately the publishers who need to act. It would also stop purchasers treating the place as a viewing room!

Pan · 29/07/2013 18:14

News - would you consider stopping stocking them altogether? It can only be a teeny proportion of your profit? And once it's known you don't stock, and why, then your footfall would increase?

And whining at the publishers is a bit weak, or am I missing something??

KristinaM · 29/07/2013 18:16

Great step in the right direction .well done co-op

I'm already a member and shop there regularly

GrimmaTheNome · 29/07/2013 18:21

And whining at the publishers is a bit weak, or am I missing something??

I think you are. If the publishers wrapped all these mags, then unless a retailer deliberately unwrapped them, then all these covers would be hidden. Job done.

CuttedUpPear · 29/07/2013 18:23

Well done Coop.
I've banked with them all my adult life and made sure my DCs do as well.

I cannot think of a bad word to say about them, accolades all the way.

YoniBottsBumgina · 29/07/2013 18:25

Magazines barely make any profit, Pan. The reasin to stock them is to attract customers who may then also purchase a drink, bar of chocolate, cigarettes or a birthday card at the same time. Choosing to not stock an entire genre of magazine cuts out a large proportion of customers as a newsagent. Conversely I probably wouldn't notice if my local newsagent stopped selling a magazine I wasn't interested in. I very much doubt it would increase custom while lads mags continue to be sold elsewhere.

Pan · 29/07/2013 18:25

No, I mean newsagents don't have to supply them at all. Possibly though there are common publishers for other items and it could become very fractious.

Pan · 29/07/2013 18:26

yeah, see that Yoni

caramelwaffle · 29/07/2013 18:29

It's welcome news.

GrimmaTheNome · 29/07/2013 18:31

Now if you were to say 'large supermarket chains' don't need to stock them at all - it'd barely dent their profit margins. Its not fair to expect small independents to lead the way on that.

Newsy, well done for putting the effort in to get the mags out of the way of youngsters.

TolliverGroat · 29/07/2013 18:35

Small independents are generally forced by the publishers to take the more "adult" titles if they want to stock the general interest magazines. The large chains have more bargaining power.

Back2Two · 29/07/2013 18:39

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn due to privacy concerns

PlentyOfPubeGardens · 29/07/2013 19:16

Excellent first step, well done, co-op. I look forward to the demise of these magazines altogether. Anything like this which 'de-normalises' them is to be welcomed.

hamab · 29/07/2013 20:08

A lot of respect for Co-op.

Patchouli · 29/07/2013 20:38

Co-op's just gone up in my estimation :)

morethanpotatoprints · 29/07/2013 20:39

Its a crying shame,

weasle · 29/07/2013 20:58

Great work Co-op. I do love the co-op for their ethical policies. Will make sure I shop there even more. We have in total seven bank accounts with them and all our insurance.

also, why onEarth do we still tolerate page 3 in the Sun in 2013. How am I going to explain how society permits that in a newspaper to my ds? I hope one day it's something like the smoking ban, where we are incredulous that smoking was ever allowed in aeroplanes or restaurants.