I thought it might be a good idea to explain why the promotion of 'breast milk substitutes' is such a problem as many mumsnetters believe it is an attack on bottle feeding mums. It is not.
this site has loads of info which explains it better than me
Also have a read at Tiktok's posts of explanation.
One of the best things to have happened since advertising was banned is that all information about bottle feeding comes from the dietitians in our hospital. It is factual advice that is given. Not claims of milk being the closest thing to breast milk ever.
We no longer have breastfeeding information leaflets that are produced by formula companies being given to women. The language was negative and the pictures were of poorly positioned babies with miserable looking mums.
We als stopped giving breast feeding women home free tins of baby milk powder "just in case" they did not have enough milk.
All this undermined the woman who chose to breastfeed before she got out the door.
There is absolutely no problem with women choosing to bottle feed when they make informed decisions.
I will post my other link on this thread too about 'guilt' and the role of advertising.
Please research this topic thoroughly before just deciding that this is just business and mumsnet needs the money.
I urge mumsnet to seek other means of revenue.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Site stuff
Why advertising formula milk is illegal and why what Milupa is doing is wrong
118 replies
mears · 24/08/2005 09:44
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.