Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Plea to MNHQ to ...

5 replies

NetworkGuy · 18/07/2010 17:10

Keep a note of any e-mail addresses which might be used by company representatives, when responding to threads on MN.

A week ago, someone posted about the way an online order for food, etc, was cancelled without notifying the customer, because a well-known supermarket had taken funds at 23:55 and then tried again 4 hours later, failing (because there were insufficient funds to pay for a further 80+ pounds of shopping in the a/c at the time).

Eventually (3-4 days later) things were sorted out, at least to a delivery being made (by security guard) and money returned (could have been faster if the supermarket had sent a fax but refused to do so).

This weekend we've had a worrying thread about how teens from 14 were encouraged to allow their Facebook pages to be made public, and provide username and password to allow some application to update their Facebook status with mildly embarrassing up to pornographic messages. After a few days of discussion, it seems the soft drinks company has closed this promotion early (been running since mid May, due to end in about 9 days) but when one sees a posting like

Cokespokesperson Sun 18-Jul-10 15:27:42

My name is Lauren Branston and I am Director for Corporate Affairs at Coca-Cola Great Britain, with Dr Pepper being one of our brands. ...

There is absolutely no proof it was from a company representative (at the time). That one was, legit, but almost anyone could have signed up and used that screen name from an anonymous free e-mail account, and written lies or promised sums of money as compensation, or whatever.

Perhaps someone 'reporting' the post to ask for its credibility to be checked (ie suitable e-mail address, not one on Hotmail or an ISP mail address, for example) might be enough.

Would also be handy for next time a marketing campaign "goes off the straight and narrow" for someone at MNHQ to have a suitable high-level contact at a business to alert them to possible problems.

In the latest thread, suggestions included reporting the company to the Police, due to the nature of the complaint.

OP posts:
OliviaMumsnet · 18/07/2010 17:23

HI there
Thanks for this - we'll discuss when we're all back in the office in the morning.
MN Towers

NetworkGuy · 18/07/2010 19:18

Not sure if you followed the Dr Pepper saga, but Coca-Cola has closed the promotion early, wiped off the "embarrassing" status messages, and presumably are keeping their heads down, as someone from the Guardian (vikram 18-Jul-10 15:53) may be putting a story together too.

OP posts:
NetworkGuy · 18/07/2010 19:48

There is now an article on the Guardian site which gives the poster's screen name, mentions 14yo daughter and says they live in Glasgow.

If you can just 'hide' the thread it might assist the poster stay a little more anonymous.

The Facebook crowd are puzzled about why Dr Pepper has stopped running this application and wonder why competition is closed early are not all happy about it...

I have already sent text to Vikram Dodd suggesting he has made the daughter a target and asking him to use Mrs X from Scotland (lots of 14yo girls across Scotland, so it is far less identifying). Hope not too many people find copy of the current article with all the details in.

OP posts:
Mouseface · 20/07/2010 15:47

Good point by NetworkGuy.

I have seen 'MrsRickman' but displayed as Mrs Rickman, on numerous links posted in the thread, which BTW, has now turned into a bun fight with no relevance to the OP at all!

Hopefully, MrsRickman refers to 'I wish I was married to Alan Rickman'

Maybe time to delete a few of the latter posts if it carries on, or just say it's full. Put a lid on it.

NetworkGuy · 20/07/2010 18:13

Yes, puzzled to find it reached 1200+ posts, and while not wanting to discourage discussion, do wonder if the suggestion made about needing to have been registered for some days before being able to post is a good one.

Where someone (reporter, company spokesperson) has a legit reason to post to a thread ASAP, it would perhaps limit the infrequent trolling invasions (such as the IT Contractors a while back, the motor racing fans late one night), or some random visitors finding a link from a foreign news website, after a MN posting gets wider coverage, and who then go off on random trajectories challenging the validity of the views of (seemingly) everyone!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page