Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Shopping

From everyday essentials to big purchases, swap tips and recommendations. For the best deals without the hassle, sign up for Mumsnet Moneysaver emails.

Can anyone recommend a cheapish digital camera for someone who is rubbish at taking pictures?

15 replies

lucysnowe · 24/03/2009 13:31

Hi all

Can you recommend a user-friendly camera for me to take pics of DD? Under £50 ideally.

Thanks!

OP posts:
OldLadyKnowsNothing · 24/03/2009 15:21

IME they're all pretty user-friendly these days, so go for the most pixels per £1.

lucysnowe · 24/03/2009 17:10

You see, I'm so rubbish I didn't even know about the pixels. ta old lady (may I call you old lady??

OP posts:
OldLadyKnowsNothing · 24/03/2009 17:33

Not knowing something doesn't equal being rubbish. OK, pixels are the tiny dots that make up your picture, and the more there are, the better-quality your picture. 10 million + are not unusual these days - my (not very posh) camera is labelled 10.3 mega pixels. The other thing to consider is the size of the memory in the camera - this might not be much, but most digital cameras will have an option to take a memory card (there are different types) and you should buy as much memory (it'll be measured in KiloBytes or more likely GigaBytes these days) as you can, as this allows you to take more pictures. Otherwise, go with what looks and feels good to you.

Marne · 24/03/2009 17:38

Dont buy a Fuji (had nothing but trouble with mine), i would recommend a Nikon (ours has lasted well and has been chucked around by the dd's .

RubberDuck · 24/03/2009 17:49

I would recommend the exact opposite - DON'T go for the most pixels per £1 - more pixels do NOT make for a better picture.

Basically, all pixels mean are the SIZE of the picture. I.e. how big the picture can be - 6 megapixels is more than enough for most purposes unless you're looking to have your pictures on billboards or magazine spreads.

In fact, larger pixel counts on cheap cameras can actually make for worse photos as they pack more pixels on to the same small chip (CCD) that records the actual information.

What makes a good camera is other subtle things that are harder to quantify as they don't come in nice neat numbers on the box: the quality of the lens, colour saturation, sharpness, how good the chip is that records the information.

Another thing you might look at is how low the noise (those speckled dots you get when taking pictures when it's low light) at higher ISO (you or the automatic bit on the camera may choose a high ISO in low light conditions - without getting too technical, that means you can hold the camera steadier and avoid camera shake without using the flash).

You can't beat seeing a camera in person, seeing if the menus make sense to you, if it feels right in your hands. I really recommend a dedicated camera shop like Jessops for this - they'll often price match to the internet once you've done your basic research. Nikon and Canon are the main industry leaders and have good quality components for the price (I've always liked the Canon Powershot range as good bang for the buck).

RubberDuck · 24/03/2009 17:50

DP Review is a very respected camera review site that will give you a better idea of each camera's quality.

RubberDuck · 24/03/2009 18:43

Canon Powershot A470 - £50 - I would be very tempted at that price - these retailed at around £100 until recently - they've brought a replacement model out so I'm guessing this is old stock being sold off.

RubberDuck · 24/03/2009 18:45

Fujifilm Finepix A850 - a bit pricer, but also worth looking at. I know Marne had a bad experience with hers, but they are good in low light.

Marne · 24/03/2009 20:10

I had to send my finepix back to fuji as the lense keeps getting stuck ,after looking on the net i found that a lot of people with fuji's have this problem. They are very easy to use but i would not by another. Go for a cannon or nikon.

RubberDuck · 24/03/2009 21:23

That's not good, Marne Yes, the Canon does look the better buy. I've loved every Canon I've owned (and I have a bit of a collection now )

lucysnowe · 25/03/2009 09:00

Definitely feel more informed now thanks! oldlady, that is v. interesting about pixels and memory - I would like to have quite a lot of memory so will look for that. Marne will avoid Fujifilm! RD, thank you for your info and recommendations! The Canon does look really good especially as all the reviewers have said that it's easy to use!

Did see this one too...

tinyurl.com/c33p29

What do you think?

OP posts:
WowOoo · 25/03/2009 09:02

I always go for either Canon or Nikon.

Always had good cameras from them with good after sales, if something goes wrong too.

Happy snapping.

RubberDuck · 25/03/2009 09:08

The Kodaks are fairly good (I have had one before), although I suspect that the Canon I linked to earlier gives you more for your money.

You really do need to see them in person though - if you don't enjoy the feel of it in your hands or find the menus clumsy to navigate through, then you just won't use it as much as you otherwise would have done.

WowOoo · 25/03/2009 09:09

Have a look at 'Which camera' in your local library too. (call to make sure it's there or to order first)
Will tell you all you need to know!

lucysnowe · 25/03/2009 13:34

thanks! will try local Jessops!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page