Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Shopping

From everyday essentials to big purchases, swap tips and recommendations. For the best deals without the hassle, sign up for Mumsnet Moneysaver emails.

Highback boosters - is isofix worth the extra money?

24 replies

TheBlonde · 04/12/2008 12:27

DS is finally too heavy for his Stage 2 seat so I want a highback booster

The isofix ones are twice the price - is isofix really worth it?

OP posts:
RubyRioja · 04/12/2008 12:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheBlonde · 04/12/2008 12:34

Thanks DS is too heavy now for those with a 5 point harness so he'll be held in by the seatbelt

OP posts:
RubyRioja · 04/12/2008 13:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheBlonde · 04/12/2008 16:58

thanks

OP posts:
TheBlonde · 05/12/2008 11:15

bump

OP posts:
SuperSillyus · 05/12/2008 13:51

My four year old is still in his stage 2 seat but when my dd was 4 I had her in a princess booster seat from mothercare which wasn't too expensive and uses the main seat belt. It has head support for long journeys when she falls asleep.
Ds2 will need the next seat too soon so watching this thread with interest for ideas.....

TheBlonde · 06/12/2008 21:13

thanks
anyone else?

OP posts:
TheBlonde · 07/12/2008 10:45

futile bump

OP posts:
TheBlonde · 15/12/2008 19:16

last ditch bump

OP posts:
ten10 · 15/12/2008 19:23

I haven't got to a booster yet, but
the other car seats we have bought have been isofix,
and I wouldn't buy anything else,

they are so solid i.e. just don't move,
whereas other a non-isofix seat i have come across seems to wriggle around far too much for my liking.
and you always know that it is fitted correctly, as they are so easy to fit.

LIZS · 15/12/2008 19:24

afaik it has yet to be proven that isofix ones are any safer at the highback stage

TheBlonde · 15/12/2008 19:31

Thanks both
I just can't see how they can justify the huge premium for the isofix

OP posts:
forevared · 16/12/2008 11:47

I've just bought a Britax Evolva Isofit for £95 from babyworld's website. I've just checked and bambinodirect are also selling it for £90
Having always used Isofix I'd personally never buy anything else and this came top in Which tests.

Fizzylemonade · 17/12/2008 20:45

Personal opinion but I have 2 children, ds2 is 2 and in britax evolva 123 (not isofix) and my husband is the only one who can get that seat to anchor well. Ds2 is still using the 5 point harness.

Ds1 is 5 and is in a maxi cosi rodi highback booster with side impact wing things which according to Which magazine was one of the safest at the time we bought it and they rated isofix as the best.

BUT on the maxi cosi the seatbelt is difficult to pull through the guide, we knew this when we bought it but didn't think of the implications. When ds1 leans forward the belt loosens but when he sits back it doesn't automatically re-tighten, he has to pull it back tight.

He is almost 6 so this isn't a problem but we have said that the next car seats we buy will be isofix because our car has the isofix fittings (we bought the car after we had bought the car seats)

Isofix is probably more suited to the younger children's child seats as it guarantees the fitting. However, in the event of a crash I would rather my child is bolted to the car with the seat rather than just the seat belt. It is partly irrational as I am only held in with a seatbelt

I would rather pay a bit more money to know that I have done everything to make my children as safe as possible.

TheBlonde · 22/12/2008 12:53

Thanks

OP posts:
TheBlonde · 01/01/2009 11:12

new year bump

OP posts:
MatNanPlusAbroad · 01/01/2009 11:17

The biggest difference is that with a high back booster the child and the seat are held with the seatbelt but with Isofix the belt is only holding the child which IMHO is much better.

Hulababy · 01/01/2009 11:35

The Which reports didn't find Isofix on high back boosters any safer in their more recent tests.

However in the first stage and second stage seats isofix does appear to come out as a fair bit safer. I would pay more for isofix for those seats.

I have 3 high back boosers here. One is Isofix, the other two not. I am not convinced at all that the isofix was worth the extra money - was double the cost.

TheBlonde · 01/01/2009 14:46

Thanks

ManNanPlusAbroad - do the seats weigh much?

OP posts:
Hulababy · 01/01/2009 22:16

Isofix seats are generally heavy because of the metal fixings attached to them.

TheBlonde · 02/01/2009 11:46

Thanks Hula

OP posts:
MatNanPlusAbroad · 02/01/2009 22:18

Yes, the are heavier.

TheBlonde · 03/01/2009 14:41

Do you think that means the isofix ones are less safe if you happen to use them with a seatbelt instead?

OP posts:
MatNanPlusAbroad · 05/01/2009 12:24

It is personal choice.

I would only use rear facing seats for my children (if they ever happen - TTC) but that is because even tho i am skilled at seat fitting - well i should be after 20years caring for babies and toddlers - some just work slack, some wobble no matter what and i do feel happier in the event of an accident with the seat taking the major initial force rather than their body.

The drawback in my veiw of using an ISOFIX seat with just a belt is the addition weight that the belt and so the child will bear in a sudden deceleration.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread