Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Shopping

From everyday essentials to big purchases, swap tips and recommendations. For the best deals without the hassle, sign up for Mumsnet Moneysaver emails.

Does anyone use these hair straighteners which claim to be better than GHD?

18 replies

Caligula · 09/01/2006 00:04

GHS

And are they?

OP posts:
Janh · 09/01/2006 00:11

DDs had them, they are much cheaper, but never better, no - they both have GHDs now and say they are 100% better than GHSs and worth the extra.

HTH

Caligula · 09/01/2006 00:14

Yes it does. I suspected they might be too good to be true!

OP posts:
BadgerBadger · 09/01/2006 00:55

I have a pair, in fact my first Q on MN was about where to find reasonably priced but good straighteners.

Someone recommended GHS and they're fab, I'd certainly buy another set of these when they eventually pack up rather than GHD's (have used both ).

Caligula · 09/01/2006 10:42

So. GHS are fab. Hmm. Now I have a dilemma.

OP posts:
AlmostAnAngel · 09/01/2006 10:44

ghds are 100"%goooooooooooood

Janh · 09/01/2006 11:36

oooh nooo, bb, not me?

(They did like them very much when they first got them, honest - they just got converted.)

BadgerBadger · 09/01/2006 11:55

lol Janh, yes it was you and thanks a million for the recommendation! I'm really pleased with them and still am . GHD's were well outside of my price range when I asked!

Caligula · 09/01/2006 12:20

Oh I've just noticed you've used both Badger. Do you really not notice any difference?

OP posts:
BadgerBadger · 09/01/2006 12:36

Genuinely, no I didn't but it is about 2 years since I used GHD's and about 2 years since I got GHS's so the specs may have changed on each.

I have the cheaper pair from the GHS site. I suppose I was put off GHD's because the owner of the pair I used a few times sent them back 3 times in all because of faults. It was probably just bad luck?

I think there's something to be said for hair type too maybe? Don't want to contradict Janh at all! GHS's suit my hair whereas her DD's seem to have had better luck with GHD's

eefs · 09/01/2006 12:38

have a Kodo hair straightener and think it is better than a GHD.

Caligula · 09/01/2006 14:44

Ooh Kodo. Another one to consider. Why better Eefs? (They look about the same price)

OP posts:
vickiyumyum · 09/01/2006 14:56

have ghd's and wouldn't be parted from them, as i know they work, i haven't been tempted to stray to another brand. although must admit did glance at the glass babyliss ones!

p.s my hair is very thick and curly and when i have used my ghd's it is soft and silky and smooth and doesn't frizz out in damp weather. i think alot of how straighteners work depneds on your hair type. if your hair is only slightly kinky(!!) then another brand would be fine.

eefs · 11/01/2006 11:34

The hair straightener needs to heat to 220º for the proper smooth silky effect (kodo and GHD do this, the cheaper ones can't). Kodo and GHD also heat quickly - more convenient. My hairdresser friend uses a mix of Kodo and GHD in her salon and says the Kodo ones last longer (not an issue for the occasional user). The kodo ones are slightly slimmer so better for doing tricks like flicks and curls.

Caligula · 11/01/2006 16:56

Ooh, so that's what I need to look for and compare - that the ceramic plates heat up to 220 degrees? Very helpful info that, thanks.

OP posts:
Janh · 11/01/2006 23:12

Ohhhh, is that it? GHSs only heat to 200.

GHDs on slightly damp hair produce an impressive amount of steam!

Caligula · 12/01/2006 21:48

I've been told you're not allowed to use hair straighteners on damp hair, except if it's that spray stuff

OP posts:
Janh · 12/01/2006 22:25

Well you're not supposed to, C - don't think it's a criminal offence

If you are in a tearing hurry and it's not quite dry it's allowed in my house.

magnolia1 · 13/01/2006 16:51

pmsl @janh

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread