Hi again, Zane.
The difficulty is that almost all appeals turn on the school's admissions criteria - and distance to school is often the point at issue ? so that without a confirmed address there's nothing the authority (or later the appeal panel) can do. Understandably, I think, authorities don't accept uncorroborated statements that ?we are planning to move to 34 Railway Cuttings? because there are parents who are willing to lie to get a school place. Hence the need for firm evidence.
I can understand that you don?t want your son to go to the unpopular school, but I think there are separate issues here which you need to untangle:
As your son has passed the 11+, where is he on the waiting list? I assume that he?ll automatically move up the list once you have a confirmed address in the area but this is something you need to check. We don?t have grammar schools here, but I have learnt from MN that some set a different pass mark depending on whether you live in or out of catchment ? check that too.
If your son is still too far down the list to get a place at the grammar school, you need to look carefully at what grounds you might have for appeal. Frankly, if everything has been done in accordance with published policies and criteria, your chances of a successful appeal aren?t high, but that isn?t to say that the situation is hopeless. Are there are, for instance, any compelling social, medical or compassionate reasons why he deserves a place? Ideally, you need to identify a reason which can be corroborated by (say) a doctor or social worker and which goes beyond the obvious disappointment of not getting the school place you want.
It?s sensible to have a back-up plan. Look at other nearby schools and identify those which you would accept. If you are offered a place at the school you don?t want, you are far more likely to succeed if you identify positive reasons for your son to attend the grammar or one of the other schools. This may entail more than one appeal (one for the grammar school and one for an alternative school).
Tactics that don?t generally succeed at appeals are
Rubbishing the school you have been allocated - This doesn?t really address the terms of the admissions code or the appeals code. The appeal has to address why (in the parent?s view) the decision not to allocate a place in the preferred school was wrong.
Threatening not to send the child to school unless a place is given in the preferred school ? Of course, home education is an option open to everyone, and might be the solution until a place in the preferred school becomes available, but threatening that the child will truant unless given a place at the first choice school will probably not win an appeal.
PositivelyFestive ? Yes, it is awkward when people feel that they haven?t had a fair hearing or that the appeal was weighted against them, but I feel comfortable that panels I have been on have worked very hard to put appellants at their ease and have really tested the school?s/LEA?s position. On threads about appeals there are also people pointing out that if panels allowed every appeal, without considering the school?s position as well as the family?s, some schools would be very overcrowded and none of the children would benefit from that.
Sorry, very long post (and a lot of it you know already) but hope this helps.