DS is in yr 9, choosing his GCSE options in the next couple of weeks. He's ADHD so genuinely struggles to pay attention to anything that doesn't interest him. He also hates school, sadly. For those two reasons his dad and I have encouraged him to choose subjects he's really keen on as the main priority.
He doesn't have a clear idea about what he wants to do in future, other than that it's unlikely to be office-based work. He loves being outdoors, he's great with people of all ages, he's sporty and creative. Landscape architecture is the career that has appealed most in recent discussions.
He's fairly bright (should be capable of 7s pretty much across the board, according to school's predictions) but he struggles to get his ideas across in essay form (if only oral exams were an option!)
He'll be taking 9 GCSEs: maths/eng/eng/dual science, then he's chosen geography, design tech and PE (he's a multi sport player which I understand will be to his advantage). That leaves one choice, which I think he's narrowed down to photography or media studies.
On the basis of my limited knowledge, the pros and cons would be:
- Photography pros: no exam (in the traditional sense) and the whole thing done and dusted before exams start (very appealing). Cons: limited applicability, a lot of self-directed work to create the portfolio.
- Media studies pros: interesting and relevant curriculum, good for developing critical thinking, broader applicability. Cons: more writing, two exams (including long form?), still a significant piece of course work to complete (but could be something really fun).
Does anyone have experience of both, and how they would fit with his other subjects? When I say "fit" I'm not concerned about his future career options as much as how he would cope with the workload for either, given that they both involve a significant course work component, and he's already wedded to design tech which does too.