Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Secondary school appeals

41 replies

wellingtondays · 18/01/2026 14:44

Has anyone won a secondary school appeal hearing . Just wondering if there are many success stories

OP posts:
atriskacademic · 09/03/2026 19:43

@Janet25 I think the drama one is probably your strongest argument, but for all of these points, you will need evidence. You'll probably struggle with the language learning argument, as hard evidence will be difficult to come by. The drama one could be stronger if her primary school teachers or any other clubs can confirm her engagement in drama.

Janet25 · 09/03/2026 19:50

atriskacademic · 09/03/2026 19:43

@Janet25 I think the drama one is probably your strongest argument, but for all of these points, you will need evidence. You'll probably struggle with the language learning argument, as hard evidence will be difficult to come by. The drama one could be stronger if her primary school teachers or any other clubs can confirm her engagement in drama.

Thank you, we can absolutely get evidence and support regarding her drama and how she’s been a member for a few years and the difference in her confidence, maybe even a statement from her primary school backing it up as it’s an area she excels in compared to traditional academic subjects.
We can back the language offering up with research showing the detriment of changing language you are already learning etc, although I appreciate this is weak.
would the Co-ed argument hold any weight or not?

DillyDallyingAllDay · 09/03/2026 20:02

I’d say coed argument wouldn’t hold up well.

Kikib82 · 11/03/2026 06:50

Could you please share your experience with me thank you

prettydesertflower · 11/03/2026 07:19

We won on “exceptional circumstances”. DC had been overseas for a good chunk of primary and needed to be in the faith based environment of our preferred school. We supplied documentation to prove were were overseas for work, his school reports which were all positive and supporting letters from DCs God parents. It was very intense and involved.

minipie · 25/03/2026 13:48

prh47bridge · 19/01/2026 11:34

Also for @VanillaDaydream

The current appeals code states that, in considering the case, the panel must consider what the school can offer that the allocated or other schools cannot. This does imply that other schools can be considered. However, taking my example, let us imagine that there are three schools in the area offering Spanish - A, B and C. If we take the "only school" approach, an appeal for school A will fail, because schools B and C teach Spanish, an appeal for school B will fail because schools A and C teach Spanish, and an appeal for school C will fail because schools A and B teach Spanish. So our child, who really needs a school that teaches Spanish, remains disadvantaged.

My argument would be that the appeal panel for school A does not know if places are available at schools B and C, nor do they know the outcome of any appeals for those schools or the strength of the case to refuse admission to those schools. It may be, for example, that schools B and C are so overcrowded that no appeal can possibly win, so if the appeal for school A is rejected on the grounds that schools B and C teach Spanish our child is definitely going to remain disadvantaged.

Given the above, my view is that, whilst there may be some circumstances in which it is appropriate to consider other schools, in general the only schools in play should be the appeal school and the allocated school. I think there was an LGO decision to this effect once, but sadly I don't have the reference and I can't find it on their website.

Just returning to this point after the training I mentioned.

I asked whether the panel should only be comparing the allocated school vs appeal school or whether other schools should be considered.

The answer I was given - very much like what you said @prh47bridge - is that other schools can be considered IF it affects the panel’s evaluation of how much a child will be prejudiced by not going to the appeal school.

So in your example, the child needs a school offering Spanish and appeals for school A offering Spanish. If the panel know that schools B and C also offer Spanish and it is known that at least one of them has a space then obviously that will greatly reduce the prejudice to child of not going to school A, since they could go to B or C instead to get their Spanish.

If it is not known whether schools B and C have spaces then that makes things a lot trickier for the panel. If it is unknown then I can see that arguably the panel should proceed as if B and C don’t have space, and just compare the appeal vs allocated school.

But I have often seen panellists be rather unimpressed that the appellant has not found this information out. It does tend to undermine an appellant’s argument that Spanish is super important, if they haven’t made the effort to find out which local schools offer Spanish and asked if they have spaces. It tends to suggest that Spanish is not the real driving force for the appeal.

Appreciate this was a complete tangent from the original post so apologies for the hijack!

OutofIdeas86 · 25/03/2026 15:12

@prh47bridge would be really keen to get your feedback on my notice of appeal! I am doing 3 school appeals, this is the first;

In accordance with the School Admissions Appeals Code of Practice 2022, the reasons outlined below form the basis of my grounds of appeal. Further supporting evidence will be submitted in line with the arrangements set by the admission authority under the above-mentioned Code.
The reasons for my appeal are summarised below:
1. Illness Impact on Common Ability Test
Charlie was diagnosed with tonsillitis by his GP and prescribed a 10-day course of antibiotics on 14 November 2025, the day before the Common Ability Test. Despite attending the test on 15 November 2025, he experienced severe throat pain, fever, and fatigue. As a result, his performance was significantly affected, and his norm-referenced band does not reflect his true academic ability. The school’s admissions policy states that where a child is unwell and unable to perform at their best, alternative school assessment data may be considered. Unfortunately, I was unaware of this provision at the time. We respectfully submit that, had this evidence been considered, Charlie may have been placed in a higher band, thereby increasing his likelihood of securing a place.
2. Extracurricular Talent and Aptitude in Alignment with School Provision
Charlie was assessed as a high-performing candidate in STT School’s drama aptitude assessment, demonstrating clear natural ability despite having had no formal drama lessons or regular opportunities to participate due to family care commitments. This highlights strong potential that could be further developed through the school’s specialist performing arts provision.
In addition, Charlie is an accomplished sportsman. He plays rugby for Northampton Casuals 1st Team and football at a high level as a midfielder for Rushden & Diamonds Academy, and also trains with Aston Villa’s development programme. STT School’s specialist provision in football and rugby—including elite training opportunities and excellent facilities—would strongly support his continued development in these areas.
3. Family and Logistical Circumstances
Charlie’s father is the primary caregiver for Charlie and his younger sibling and is also a registered carer for Charlie’s grandfather, who has advanced heart disease and requires daily support with mobility and medical needs. This requires frequent visits, often including overnight stays, at his grandparents’ home, located just 400 metres from STT School.
Attendance at STT School would enable Charlie to travel safely and independently between school, home, and his grandparents, ensuring stability and continuity in his daily routine. By contrast, the allocated school is significantly further away, creating practical difficulties and extended periods without appropriate supervision.
Since learning that he has not been allocated a place at one of his preferred schools, Charlie has experienced stress and anxiety, for which GP support has been sought. We believe that admission to STT School would significantly reduce this anxiety and support a smoother transition to secondary education, particularly given his current primary school has only 62 pupils.
4. School Capacity
STT School currently accommodates Years 7–9 and is due to expand to Year 10 in 2026. We understand that the school has the capacity to admit an additional pupil without causing prejudice to the efficient education of others or the effective use of resources.
We respectfully submit that admitting Charlie would not adversely impact the school and would allow him to benefit from an environment well suited to both his academic potential and his family’s exceptional circumstances.

These points are not exhaustive and may be supplemented with further information and supporting evidence in due course.

MarchingFrogs · 25/03/2026 16:10

I'm not sure that @prh47bridge or anyone else who has commented on your own thread will advise very much different than they have already tbh.

Re the school having capacity to take extra pupils into year 7, because there will be only three year groups in the school, be prepared to be told that the school is only funded incrementally, according to the number of pupils it shoukd have. So it is very unlikely to have, e.g. desks and chairs for years 10 and 11 just sitting around available to be borrowed for a few extra pupils added to lower year groups, and almost certainly won't have a full year 7 to year 11 lrevel of funding for staff.

The prejudice is principally to the efficient provision of education to those in the year group, the effect on the workload of teachers and other staff re that year group etc.

draztik · 25/03/2026 16:49

@minipie "If it is unknown then I can see that arguably the panel should proceed as if B and C don’t have space, and just compare the appeal vs allocated school."

If I was defending the school's case then I might ask the appellant whether they have appealed to those schools too and, if not, why not. If Spanish is so important then it would be reasonable to expect them to have appealled to each of them.

clarrylove · 25/03/2026 17:48

We won. I used a lot of the info on elevenplusexams forum

myrtleWilson · 25/03/2026 18:35

What are you going to do if the various experts who’ve commented on your situation @OutofIdeas86 (on other threads and with you using a different username) are giving different advice to the appeals consultant you’re presumably paying? Is their advice to go with the tonsillitis issue - although as I understand from previous threads, it’s not clear at all to me that even if he was on a different band he’d get one of the randomised offers?

prh47bridge · 25/03/2026 21:26

@OutofIdeas86 - My thoughts:

1 - I'm afraid I don't find this persuasive. You aren't in a position to argue that the school made a mistake, so the fact that your son perhaps should have been in a higher band doesn't help. It doesn't show that he will be disadvantaged by not attending the school, which is what the appeal panel are looking for. The most that this could give you is for your son to be put into a different band when considering the waiting list, but that is for the school to decide, not the appeal panel.

2 - This point has potential but I would want to hear more about how this school's provision for drama and sports differs from the allocated school. What is it that they offer that means your son will be disadvantaged if he is not admitted?

3 - I would not expect the appeal panel to give any weight to arguments around logistics, family circumstances, etc. As currently phrased, I wouldn't expect them to give any weight to your son's stress and anxiety. That will only fly if his GP writes a letter saying that, in his professional opinion, your son needs to be admitted to the appeal school due to his stress and anxiety. Even then, the appeal panel may not give it much weight.

4 - It is unlikely that you will be able to persuade the panel that there will be no adverse impact on the school from admitting an additional pupil and, at the moment, this section is really just a bare assertion on your part. It would help if you can show that they've gone over PAN in previous years.

Kalimero · 30/03/2026 16:12

@prh47bridge Thank you for all information you have shared on this forum, it's very helpful.
Some people say that offered school shouldn't be discussed or called 'unacceptable' or incompatible as it might offend the members of the Appeal panel.
Is there truth in that??
Also is it acceptable to explain the reasons why offered school isn't a good match for your child? With emphasis on the knife crime students rates, involvement outside of the school, police patrols due to that school students organised weapons clashes and newspapers articles of that school involvement in most recent Red Vs Blue secondary school social media trend (that school students organising weapons clashes with other schools)?
Thank you

prh47bridge · 30/03/2026 16:30

Some people say that offered school shouldn't be discussed or called 'unacceptable' or incompatible as it might offend the members of the Appeal panel.
Is there truth in that??

Yes. The appeal panel will be independent from the appeal school and the local authority, but they may have connections with the allocated school. You can discuss the features the appeal school has got that are missing from the allocated school, but avoid being directly critical of the allocated school. If, for example, one of the panel has a child or grandchild at the allocated school, calling it "unacceptable" may alienate them, making them less likely to give you the benefit of any doubt.

Also is it acceptable to explain the reasons why offered school isn't a good match for your child? With emphasis on the knife crime students rates, involvement outside of the school, police patrols due to that school students organised weapons clashes and newspapers articles of that school involvement in most recent Red Vs Blue secondary school social media trend (that school students organising weapons clashes with other schools)?

No, for the reasons given in my previous answer. Also remember, you are appealing for the school you want, not against the school you've got. Talking about this stuff may explain why you don't want your child at the allocated school, but it doesn't give the panel any reason to admit your child to the appeal school. And no matter how bad this school is, someone is going to have to go there.

draztik · 30/03/2026 16:32

Kalimero · 30/03/2026 16:12

@prh47bridge Thank you for all information you have shared on this forum, it's very helpful.
Some people say that offered school shouldn't be discussed or called 'unacceptable' or incompatible as it might offend the members of the Appeal panel.
Is there truth in that??
Also is it acceptable to explain the reasons why offered school isn't a good match for your child? With emphasis on the knife crime students rates, involvement outside of the school, police patrols due to that school students organised weapons clashes and newspapers articles of that school involvement in most recent Red Vs Blue secondary school social media trend (that school students organising weapons clashes with other schools)?
Thank you

@Kalimero , you can say what you like about the offered school, but there is always a risk that the panel members will disagree and/or be offended by it, e.g. if their own children go there or they know someone who teaches there.

I suggest you don't mention the red v blue social media trend. Everyone knows that was hyped up and spread by naive parents, not students, e.g see BBC News - "How the 'red v blue school wars' exposed the social media gap between children and parents"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy4wgzdydkeo

A treated image showing two people struggling over a phone

How the 'red v blue school wars' exposed the social media gap between children and parents

Parents were frightened by social posts that seemed to encourage violence at schools. But it was more complicated than it looked

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy4wgzdydkeo

Kalimero · 30/03/2026 16:39

Thank you both for your answers 🙏🏼

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread