Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Secondary end of year test. End of year targets set by the schools how many students reach them?

39 replies

SNoraWotzThat · 10/06/2008 15:55

So end of year target for year 7, set as 6c and test result back today are 5c, which is the same as her English test results leaving primary last year, that was 5c.

What do you think? How do they set the target, and how has dd not moved forward 12 months. She has put the work in to her school course work and is a hard worker.

Any teachers out there, I would be thankful for your input. What would you do? What should I do. What should dd do, she is very disappointed.

OP posts:
Piffle · 13/06/2008 14:47

good news snora for your dd the hard work paying off.

Ds1 is phenomenal at maths. But although high performing grammar and in higher extended class there are several boys on 8a and ds has always had progress grade of 1 above average attainment on target to exceed level...
dunno system is a farking mystery.
oh yes we know about EP grades. He is up for one in English and chemistry and physics. But it requires hauling people over hot coals to award them..
Mind boggles but ds is reasonably happy if not a little bored I guess.
think the grading system is very difficult though..

snorkle · 13/06/2008 14:53

SNora - glad it's all OK after all.

Piffle - I find all the levels a bit bewildering too (we don't have them), so that 8/ep stuff went right over my head. But has your school sorted out something for your ds to help with his boredom yet?

fizzbuzz · 13/06/2008 16:37

Oh yes, absolutely sure, It works like this.

End ks1 expected or average level 3
End ks2 """"""""""""""""""""""""" 4
End ks3 """""""""""""""""""""""" 5

It is where students are expected to be at end of Year 9. Some may be higher, some lower, but that is the average standard of attainment across the country. It is a benchmark of who can gain 5 GCSE at C or above.

I know it seems very low. The school I teach in, hardly any kids are a 5 but that is where it is. Remember this is across the whole country including all sink/ low achieving schools.

Piffle · 13/06/2008 17:19

yeah snorkle... He is starting up an ultimate frisbee group!
seriously teacher today said big changes in pipeline for the exceptionally able... Visible changes hooray!!!!!!

snorkle · 13/06/2008 17:24

Thanks fizzbuzz, It's 2 for end of ks1, so increases 2 level in ks2 and I assumed it went up another 2 levels at ks3, but I suppose there is one less year in ks3 than ks2. Our private school did SATs at junior level, but not senior so I'm not familiar with it at all after year 6.

Five does seem shockingly low though for year 9.

seeker · 13/06/2008 18:19

Bloody hell - is is really only level 5 at the end of year 9? I thought it was 6! I can't tell you how depressing I find that!

fizzbuzz · 13/06/2008 18:54

Well I don't know about KS1 as I don't teach it so it may well be level 3

However I do know about ks2 as they come to us with 4 and 5.

And I know about ks3 as I teach it Level 5 isn't really that low. If it is reached in English Maths and Science, it indicates that the child can gain 5 GCSE a-c.
It seems low to me, as most of our kids are 6/7/8 with very few 5's. BUT across the whole country it is where the government expect ks3 to be. Try and take it out of context of your dc's school and apply it across the whole country.........

seeker · 13/06/2008 19:11

But if most children get a level 4 in Year 6, does that mean they only progress one sub level a year in 7, 8 and 9? Or am I missing something?

fizzbuzz · 13/06/2008 19:15

Yes, I think it is 18 months for 2 sub levels in KS3

fizzbuzz · 13/06/2008 19:23

I think it can be a level 6, but the majority are meant to be level 5 ish

So a kid coming through at ks2 on a 4c, may would probably reach a 5 (probably)
A 4b would be a 5
A 4a could be a 6, but as a rule of thumb for predicting GCSE grades from Sat scores, I work:
End ks3 5 would project a c at GCSE
6 """"""""""""""" b """"""
7 """"""""""""""" a """"""
8 """""""""""""""a* """""""

It's not quite as clear cut as that, eg a 5 can also indicate a D, they are sort of split down the middle. As are end of KS3 marks. Most are expected gain a 5, but some a 6, so I suppose the average for end KS3 would be a 5a

tortoiseSHELL · 13/06/2008 19:25

KS1 - expected to achieve 2b. Highest they can achieve is level 3, which doesn't have gradings at KS1. So 2a or 3 is above average at end of KS1.

KS2 - I think they say 4b (though we haven't reached there yet).

Glad your dd got sorted out. Something a friend who taught said was that you could just about disregard the KS2 levels the children arrived with, as some would have been 'taught' to the syllabus, and wouldn't actually 'be' that level iyswim, especially after the summer break. Others might not have achieved well, because of illness, or because their school didn't go in for lots of revision for SATS or whatever, but actually their subject knowledge and understanding was better than someone's with a higher KS2 result.

My brother is doing a lot of research into education atm, for his phd, and he has found some interesting things about KS levels - for example, he said to do a proper comparison you should only look at KS2 and KS4 levels, as some schools will artificially hold the kids back at KS1 and KS3 so that they have added 'more value' when it comes to the dreaded league tables.

Piffle · 14/06/2008 10:29

at ds1s boys grammar the boys are told they can get to two sublevels in a year.

seeker · 15/06/2008 21:55

My dd has gone up 2 or 3 sublevels in most subjects in her first year at secondary - and so have all her friends - I thought this was normal. In maths she's gone from 4a to 6c - that's 4 sublevels - English 5 to 6a. And she is by no means the sharpest knife in the box. Should I be more impressed with both her and her school?!

ravenAK · 16/06/2008 22:35

Take it all with a pinch of salt!

Firstly, SATs don't have sub-levels. So even if everything's above board, we routinely get 'Level 5' students in y7 who are actually at the top of level 4 - so we'd probably give average marks of 4A, but in their KS2 SATs the best-fit may have been Level 5.

Also, teachers are expected to show progression - or we don't get payrises.

So - if X has a KS2 result of 5, but I think he's probably working at a 4A, the self-serving thing for me to do is to mark him as a 4C or B on his 'progress review' in September. Then come the exams, he's probably genuinely about a 5B or 5A - but if his performance is borderline enough for me to justify saying he's now (wow!) a level 6...then it's going to look great on my performance review.

I'm not saying I consciously cook the books (but I know teachers who do). Just that you can expect start of year to be rounded down & end of year rounded up...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread