@Alisaann
I would like to reassure you without angering any strong supporters of the grammar school system.
Whether your DD goes to the grammar or the good comprehensive she will do equally well.
You are clearly a very caring mum who values education.
Regarding trying the 11+ exam - I would say it depends on what the exam is testing. Exam prep for the sake of exam prep can sometimes be a waste of time if it doesn't tie in well with what the curriculum. Have a look at the 11+ past papers for your grammar school, if they are testing relevant curriculum subjects just a bit expanded its worth brushing up and preparing. This will put your child in a good position for starting year 7 anywhere.
However if the tests are not directly related to curriculum i.e. very NVR heavy and the grammar is super competitive (i.e. a lot of prep is normally required to pass - speak to the parents of kids who passed). I would say you're better off going the comp route and using the time to brush up all the key aspects of Key Stage 2 and maybe looking at Key Stage 3 stuff a bit earlier. Its good to start year 7 confident in your knowledge and skills. It will make them enjoy school a lot more at the beginning.
Evidence for Grammar Schools not being "better" than Comps:
Objective large scale studies have been done on grammar schools which show:
- No Significant Progress Advantage
- Education Policy Institute (2018): Once prior attainment is controlled for, grammar schools provide only a marginal progress boost compared to comprehensive schools overall.
- Department for Education (2023): Grammar schools excel in raw attainment but show minimal advantage in Progress 8 scores, and are outperformed by top comprehensives.
- No Clear Social Mobility Benefit (may not directly apply to you)
- Sutton Trust (2017): Disadvantaged pupils at grammar schools do not outperform their comprehensive counterparts in GCSEs.
- Education Policy Institute (2016): Even after securing similar grades, disadvantaged grammar school students are less likely to enter elite universities than their wealthier peers.
I do not buy into the myth that going to grammar school guarantees you higher educational attainment than if you went to a comprehensive school simply because there is no evidence of this happening.
Grammar schools dominanting league tables is just a reflection of selection bias.
If you want to see how well a school functions academically - check the progress score not the raw attainment.
There is one area where grammar schools stand out from comprehensives:
Education Policy Institute report (2018) found the proportion of Free School Meals (FSM) eligible students in grammar schools is around 6-7%, compared to 28-30% in non-selective schools. They concluded grammar schools reinforced socio-economic stratification.
In other words grammar schools are socially selective. I have no views on whether this is good or bad for the individual pupil and some people prefer this for their children. Having said this based on catchment area, good comprehensives are also socially selective by house price!