My daughter is applying to these three schools, and while my son has got into St John's already, she's favoured Epsom so far.
However I'm still very uncertain as to which one would be best for her. My understanding was that Epsom works them the hardest, does Saturday school and is an all rounder school for pupils who want to be busy and stretched. St Johns is good and for all rounders but a little gentler, and that CLFS is a little more academic, but also smaller and a closer community.
However, Epsom will have a new head next year, who seems to be coming from a much gentler school that focuses on 'adventure' (Dauntsey). That's not what either she or I want, and I won't have the chance to see what he does because she's moving next year. He may simply be good at delivering what the board of governors wants but it has still unnerved me.
She's academically very capable, more on the English side than the Maths, and very sporty, although not always in the top teams. She's very sociable, but can become anxious or unsettled by the shifting politics of friend groups and so on. St John's seems a safe bet for a few reasons, but I suspect she's interested in the idea of a different school to her brother, who is very different from her. That might suggest CLFS, but it initially seemed a little too cosy for her. Then I saw another thread where some people had had very bad bullying experiences there (none in the last year or so), and now I don't know what to think. I thought their open day explanation of their pastoral approach was by far the best of the three schools, but I half worry they won't push her enough and half that they will push her too much!
Does anyone have any views or insight into any or all of these schools, and in particular what to make of the new head joining Epsom?