@DaddyPhD Indeed, and that is why the OP needs to contact individual bursars. I audited five SW London schools (we were used as external consultants to run the figures to check for eligibility).
You would, however, be very surprised by some people’s thinking behind bursaries and assets not counting. These examples are from over 20 years ago though and I’m sure don’t apply to the OP.
In my lifetime I saw a family who had a top of the range Range Rover and a Maserati on finance who couldn’t understand that they would be expected to drive less fancy cars and have an extra £600 a month towards fees.
Or the family with thirty rental properties, all owned outright but held in a company. All were listed in the Land Registry in their names.
Or the people with a house in the South of France which we picked up on through the numerous EasyJet payments at least twice a month.
Or the best one was the “single” parent who and “lived” in a small flat in Tower Hamlets. Ownership of the flat was with a company in her ex husbands name which was fine as he lived abroad and she paid rent. She declared no contact. We then uncovered she was listed as an active director of almost 20 companies, also in her ex husbands name - five of which were operational with a combined turnover of £200m. Turned out she actually lived rent free in a rather nice house in leafy north London, rent free, again owned by the ex. Her rental arrangements and involvement in active companies meant we could argue that the father was still around in some capacity (even if only through business arrangements) and could contribute to fees.
The great majority of applications were, however, from genuine hardworking families who needed help with fees. The process is intrusive for very good reason but I would encourage people to apply. They aren’t trying to make you destitute but do ask you to be realistic about outgoings and assets and whether you genuinely need help.