DS1 has an EHCP. He attended an ASD provision within a mainstream school. Pupils expected to be in mainstream for majority of time, but DS1 developed severe anxiety and depression in Yr9.
He dropped loads of subjects, so was only doing Maths, English, Combined Science, History and a L1 Btec in Business Enterprise.
He would occasionally go to lessons, but not regularly and mostly worked in the ASD provision.
Throughout he was predicted a Level 1D for the Btec, it's on all school progress reports. This was a subject taught by the School SENCo.
Come results day he got a U.
DS1 didn't need any grades for his Post 16 but this was a surprise result, so I asked the school if they could explain what had happened.
I have been informed that he did very well in the YR10 units, but no work was collected for him in Year 11, hence the U. The SENCo have since left so the ASD provision teacher cannot explain what happened. She had assumed they were collecting work, as was the arrangement for his other subjects.
On the one hand, it doesn't matter as his post-16 is unaffected. On the other, I am feeling DS1 has been let down on this, he passed History and Combined Science, and got 3s in Maths and both English. I feel that if the mainstream teachers could support DS1, and he did well to get those grades with rarely entering the classes, then surely the actual school SENCo should have been more on it?
But then again would a formal complaint really achieve anything, as nothing will change the outcome and the teacher who had responsibility has now left.