Wondering if anyone else's child sat OCR GCSE Classics on Friday.
DD's teacher is due to come back to them this afternoon but not sure if I should be doing anything or just chalk it up to experience.
Advanced notice said there were 4 areas of major focus so teacher concentracted teaching on that - out of the 4 only 2 came up on exam. So lots of what they had been taught/revised was not assessed.
The advanced notice listed low tarriff topics - they had been taught as a brief overview and were anticipating 1 mark question etc. However on day significant part of paper was on low tariff topics so not just 1 mark but 10 marks. Answers required detail that brief overview hadn't covered. This was case for several low tarrif topics.
The final 15 mark essay literature question was a disaster as they hadn't been taught either of the texts. DD Has explained it to me as beng expected to do an essay on Macbeth or Blood Brothers in English Lit with quotes having never read either.
It isn't as clear cut as Physics debacle last week - it wasn't will not be on exam.
I'm not clear what exactly has gone wrong re literature. DD says usually questions are not on a specific text eg question about food and you can refer to literary texts you have studied.
I'm not clear if it is board or teacher error or just one of those things. Teacher is the only one in school teaching this so I assume just his judgment call what to cover.
FWIW DD is at a state school and most candidates for OCR Classics are private school so will have had online teaching throughout covid so I suspect a lot of candidates will have been taught whole syllabus so not as much of an issue that the advanced notice was poor.
It just feels very unfair. At end of day I know it doesn't matter in grand scheme but wondered if I should be contacting school. DD was predicted a top grade and was planning on A Level but is now understandably saying she's not doing it.