I fear we are going round in circles here. As has been explained several times now, it is very common for parents to argue that their child is worried about starting primary/secondary school and wants to stay with friends from nursery/primary school. That is never enough for the panel to allow the appeal, as the panel will almost certainly take the view that all schools know how to help nervous new starters settle in. To stand any chance of success, parents will need to show that this nervousness is on a level where it can be regarded as a medical need to be at this school, confirmed in the opinion of a health care professional.
As PatriciaHolm explained, in the current climate there are likely to be even more appeals mentioning anxiety or mental health needs. That isn’t to belittle your son’s problems at all, but it means that now more than ever the panel will expect you to show that there’s something different about the preferred school that means that it can meet your son’s needs while other schools can’t.
If you mention the outdoor curriculum, you therefore need to demonstrate how it would help your son. I’m sure every secondary school would say that it helps with pupils’ personal, social and emotional development, so why does your son need this particular programme?
We all know that physical activity improves mental health, but why is the provision so much better for your son at the preferred school? Surely the offered school has sports clubs too?
The questions above are rhetorical but I’m trying to show what the panel will be looking for and what your evidence needs to cover.
I would strongly advise against mentioning the offered school’s Ofsted rating or the number of pupils on free school meals etc. It will make you sound as if you consider yourself too good for that school and could backfire on you. For all you know, panel members have children at that school.