So @elliejjtiny, what is it you'd like changed or made available to DS in school?
- access to appropriate education?
- access to extra curric activities?
- access to therapeutic help?
DS is covered by the Equality Act 2010 &
Gov't SEND Code of Practice
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/398815/SEND_Code_of_Practice_January_2015.pdf
In a nutshell - schools shouldn't discriminate on the basis of the disability. Pupils must be able to access education and extra curriculum activities. If a pupil requires special educational provision, it should be provided.
If DS's needs cannot be met within the school's SEND budget, then school should be making the application for the EHCP.
Lack of £ is not a defence for not providing adequate learning and activities for pupils with SEND.
So, either school is not appropriately differentiating activities that DS could do because they don't want to or they haven't got the funds for it. Which is when they should make the EHCP application.
- Current diagnosis
Ask for the report. Was DS diagnosed via a MDT (multi disciplinary team - paed neurol &, clinical psych, & SALT & OT & hearing & sight tests)?
As I understand things, only a psychiatrist or a clinical psychologist (who are specifically ASD trained) can assess, score and diagnose.
If not, I would be asking how DS got the ASD traits mention.
If you can I would self refer to a clinical psych for further investigation. I can recommend one in East London.
His behaviour and suicide attempt may be related to his medical diagnosis (eg extreme anxiety) or something else.
It might be quicker to go the private diagnostic route rather than LEA. A robust IEP should be as good as an EHCP in terms of providing guidance to schools for the DC needs. Not all DC qualify for an EHCP.
- IEP
It sounds like DS's current one is not fit for purpose. It should reflect the child's current attainment levels and short, medium and long term goals. Education, social & behavioural.
The clinical report from his diagnosis and OT should form the basis of the IEP.
MH should be noted on the IEP.
The SENCO should be writing this.
It could be organised by lesson. How his diagnosis impacts each lesson. What accommodations & differentiations the teacher could make. & include break times and extra curric activities.
The IEP should note if the strategies worked. Termly updates to modify the IEP.
The IEP is also useful for keeping a record of the DC's classroom needs so the school can make an application for exam adjustments.
Some of the accommodations are governed by the JQC, others are at the discretion of the school.
www.wrightslaw.com/bks/feta2/ch12.ieps.pdf
- Access to counselling.
A TA with further training may not be appropriate for a child with a complex medical diagnosis & ASD (?) & who has attempted suicide. I would ask why the TA cancels and why school have decided that this person is appropriate.
- I don't believe DC should be able to opt out at this age of counselling. It is as important as medicines. If a child refused their meds, there would be an investigation. Good therapy is good medicine.
- Do you / DS have access to a local E.D. help group?