Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

New T levels replacing BTECs petition: the government "responded"

4 replies

Coronateachingagain · 23/08/2021 21:31

Here is the link to the petition (still on, please sign so it is properly debated)

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/592642

And the response so far:

"The Government will fund a range of qualifications to be taken alongside or as alternatives to T Levels and A levels in future. This may include some Pearson BTECs provided they meet new criteria for funding approval. Final plans setting out the groups of qualifications that will be available alongside T Levels and A levels in future were published on 14 July. This followed a consultation on level 3 qualifications that ran from 23 October to 31 January.
The case for change is strong. For too long we have allowed too many young people to leave education without the skills employers need. The Wolf Review (2011) found that the content of many technical qualifications was not valued by employers and provided little value to students. Similarly, the Sainsbury Review (2016) found that employers continue to report that many individuals who have successfully completed qualifications remain poorly equipped to enter skilled work. Now more than ever as we recover from the pandemic, we need students to finish education well equipped to progress to further training or to get a skilled job, allowing businesses to recover and thrive.
Our reforms to level 3 qualifications will strengthen pathways to progression, creating clearly defined academic and technical routes centred around A levels and T Levels with qualifications leading to further study, and/or skilled employment. This clarity of purpose will provide students with a range of good options and allow them to see more easily how their study will help them to progress.
We have consulted in two stages on reforms to level 3 qualifications alongside T Levels and A levels and have listened to feedback at each stage of the review. The response to the second stage consultation sets out the range of situations where we see a role for qualifications to sit alongside T Levels and A levels. Alongside T Levels, this includes technical qualifications that support progression to occupations outside of the T Level framework. On the academic route, we will fund a small range of high quality academic qualifications to sit alongside A levels and help students to progress to higher education (HE). These include A level-sized qualifications designed to complement A level study, often with a practical component, and large qualifications designed to enable access to specialist HE. These qualifications will fulfil a role similar to current Applied General qualifications, which include some BTECs. We will set a high bar for quality and for demonstrating the need for qualifications, particularly if there is overlap with A levels.

We recognise that some students do not always know what they want to do at 16 and that is why we need outstanding information, advice and guidance to support them to make good choices. Others may also need to study in different ways in the future such as accessing T Levels through the newly launched T Level Transition Programme. We will explore how to support students who need additional support before they are ready for A levels and other academic qualifications at level 3 through a consultation on level 2 and below qualifications later this year.
Department for Education

OP posts:
Coronateachingagain · 23/08/2021 21:35

From the response: "This may include some Pearson BTECs provided they meet new criteria for funding approval. "

Now anyone knows what is this criteria about or are they still trying to come up with it? I really hope they use this loop to backtrack a bit in their decision and fill the gap they will leave if they take away most BTECs...

OP posts:
mangomania · 23/08/2021 21:37

Well that’s clear as mud....

CherryBunsAndLollies · 23/08/2021 21:46

@Coronateachingagain
I think the funding criteria are those BTECs that don’t have significant crossover with T levels.

Coronateachingagain · 23/08/2021 21:55

The thing is also, they are focusing too much on content (and coming up with things they will not be able to deliver, like tons of well designed work experience overnight) and not enough on the format. So many children will be left behind because the system does not suit them. Doors shut, iron ceiling and no university option. What a loss to society and lots of harm inflicted too. Not to mention shooting down another social mobility path. Is this also really a university cost exercise? Ahhh

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread