DD is in Y6 and we have (probably...) picked the secondary school that she will eventually go to. This school has an 11+ and 13+ entry. We couldn't decide whether she should go at 11 or 13, but put her in for 11+ as that was the first deadline.
The 11+ test (ISEB) was in December and she was offered a place with a substantial academic scholarship. However, we have decided that, on reflection, we don't want her going at 11, so we asked to have her transferred to the 13+ process. The school were great, and agreed to do this and waived her sitting the 13+ pre-tests that were due to take place a few weeks later.
We have now had a letter offering her an unconditional place at 13+...but no mention of a scholarship. Looking at their website, scholarships are not normally decided until end of Year 8, when common entrance (or school's own version if child is not at a prep) is taken. However, the offer letter is v clear that DD's place is unconditional - she will not be asked to take any more tests.
I'm wondering whether to mention the scholarship to the school...? It could well be that she just wasn't as strong against the 13+ crowd, but it seems odd - their 11+ entry is generally thought to be much more competitive than their 13+ - there are far more applicants at 11+ (most local school only go to Year 7) and only half the number of places.
I don't want to sound grabby, but it was a pretty generous fee reduction. Thoughts...?