@Cuddling57
'Any allowances/compensation made for the extenuating circumstances?'
I feel this is all of them!
A lot in my child's maths class seem borderline 4. If they had been at school as normal surely a lot more of them would pass? If they take working at grades and they are all just below a 4 they will have to resit the exam either another year or November. I just don't feel that's right.
It seems that there is no clear plan yet, and schools may be devising their own systems. Not surprising given that the guidance from govt/Ofqual is not yet forthcoming.
Potentially basing grades on work already completed/work not yet done. Or on mocks, mini tests, class-based timed or not timed assessments.
Then work will be 'judged' based on where a child is placed within a class/year group/ what they know on some or all of the curriculum/what they might have got on their best day/what they might have got had they had access to face to face teaching for all of the course/where teachers think they are now and can evidence, without acknowledgment of either lost teaching time/expertise or the MH/practical impact of the epidemic which will vary between students.
Essentially, it is currently a mess - and not just because CAGs are a hard thing to do in a system not designed for CAGs, but because the govt has failed to plan. Failing schools, teacher and kids.
FWIW, I think teachers should have the flexibility to use whatever evidence they see fit that show students in their best light. We have to have trust that schools will not game the system - this would be picked up if an entire cohort does much better than previous cohorts. But I think an essential part of the process should be students' well-being, and putting more pressure on them now would be cruel to some. So no to high stakes tests and no to judging them as if the pandemic hadn't happened.
Final word - I've not seen much about students with SEN. Many will not have had access to the additional support they would have had in normal times, nor the intensive kind of exam practice etc that would happen when the curriculum is finished. They may have had greater struggles to engage with online learning (and trust me, many, many of these students have not been in school especially in secondary). They are at a greater disadvantage for sure - not heard anything about how this will be mitigated. Including on here. (Also applies to EAL, and other characteristics that may not have met the 'vulnerable' children high bar, but who are certainly more disadvantaged than the average student)